LogFAQs > #928272796

*Sigh* Let's go back to your first post in this topic.

MelzezDoor posted... Now that we can (officially) call it murder what motive could she have had for murdering him? Prior conflict? Noisy neighbor? Racism or not feels like there must have been another reason.

We already know her motive for killing him and exactly how/why it happened. If you actually followed the case, you would too. If there was any other credible reason for her killing him, the prosecution (who spent thousands of man hours on this case) would have brought it up and backed it up with facts. None of your proposed alternatives have any amount of credible evidence to back them up. Literally zero evidence. You bringing up other alternatives and then suggesting that some alternative *must* be her true reason for killing him does nothing but muddle the facts for anyone uneducated on the case, which is a hindrance to anyone attempting to learn more about the case. My position is backed by facts and evidence brought out during the trial. Your position is literally nothing but baseless speculation about facts which aren't in question. Nobody but the low IQ people are confused about this.

MelzezDoor posted...

I can name several people I've met that no amount of man hours or pouring through media would be able to tell. In this case the only other person who could tell us anything about it is dead.

Right here is where you tried to shift the goal posts. Your whole argument went from "there must be another reason she killed him", suggesting they actually knew each other or had some prior interaction, to "you can't prove that they weren't aware of each others existence". I mean yeah, it's possible they might have passed each other in the hallway and became aware of each other existence. But now what? How is this helpful or have anything to do with the case? It doesn't. The prosecution already worked that angle and they didn't find anything useful or relevant so we have to rely on the testimony/facts brought up during the case. All indication is that they didn't know each other at all. Any speculation beyond that is contrary to facts.

MelzezDoor posted...

I wasn't referring to Alexanaxela's post. No need to make shit up. StormFury's was a joke but mine wasn't? Your bias is showing itself.

.....What? I never said you were responding to Alex's post. I was simply setting up relationship between Alex's and StormFury's posts. I wasn't "making shit up".
And yes, StormFury's post was a joke. Anyone who's familiar with the "cops get paid vacation time for killing people" memes knows that his post was joke. Your original post was not a joke. It was a serious inquiry. For some reason, you're not satisfied with the factual answers.

Anyway I'm done wasting time on you.

---

https://imgur.com/MDQBi2C