LogFAQs > #932160984

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 255: A Holiday Present From Tulsi
xp1337 12/28/19 2:25:28 PM #199:	ChaosTonyV4 posted... Also no, I think theres probably a threshold where even those #bluenomatterwho people just dont show up, because in the end theyd rather be right than elect not a Democrat. That's convenient! so like where is the sweet spot? Is it Booker's 80? Bloomberg's 82? Buttigieg's 92? Aside from the disagreeing with the philosophy underlying this theory I feel it adds this additional problem - what is the "ideal" result? Or is it a nebulous idea that can shift so that it is always in support of a certain candidate? Like if you define it as "idk like 85" because that would technically make Sanders the closest (by 1 to Bloomberg) what happens when the next time the poll is run and he's no longer the closest? It also leads to super weird results if you look at the ideology of the candidates. I'm assuming you think Sanders's 87 is a "good" result here. So, logically speaking, Bloomberg's 82 has to be the second or third best result (to Buttigieg on the other side of it), right? In what universe does that make sense? Is Bloomberg among the Top 3 candidates the Democrats could choose? --- xp1337: Don't you wish there was a spell-checker that told you when you a word out? <cite>xp1337 posted [p:932160984] in Politics C... [t:78275618]...</cite> <quote>ChaosTonyV4 posted... </cite> <quote>Also no, I think theres probably a threshold where even those #bluenomatterwho people just dont show up, because in the end theyd rather be right than elect not a Democrat.</quote>That's convenient! so like where is the sweet spot? Is it Booker's 80? Bloomberg's 82? Buttigieg's 92? Aside from the disagreeing with the philosophy underlying this theory I feel it adds this additional problem - what is the "ideal" result? Or is it a nebulous idea that can shift so that it is always in support of a certain candidate? Like if you define it as "idk like 85" because that would technically make Sanders the closest (by 1 to Bloomberg) what happens when the next time the poll is run and he's no longer the closest? It also leads to super weird results if you look at the ideology of the candidates. I'm assuming you think Sanders's 87 is a "good" result here. So, logically speaking, Bloomberg's 82 has to be the second or third best result (to Buttigieg on the other side of it), right? In what universe does that make sense? Is Bloomberg among the Top 3 candidates the Democrats could choose? --- xp1337: Don't you wish there was a spell-checker that told you when you a word out?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1