LogFAQs > #933773833

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Christians ADMIT that their 2 y/o is DEAD and will NOT be RESURRECTED!!!
Far-Queue 02/01/20 7:47:24 AM #26:	Disagree. For the aforementioned reasons: Far-Queue posted... You're assuming zealots operate within some frame of logic or normalcy Far-Queue posted... There are scores of people who believe that their god is capable of anything. Look at all those people that attend these churches where the pastor lays "healing hands" on ailing members of the congregation. Look up the numerous articles on parents who lost children to treatable illnesses when they turned to prayer to heal their kids instead of modern medicine. Far-Queue posted... Those who are fully indoctrinated in their faith have belief that runs so deep they believe in miracles against common sense or probability. Those types of people do not know how unlikely the outcome will be, because they believe their god and their faith will be rewarded against all improbable outcomes. Hence why you see people seeking faith healing over traditional medicine. To be clear, I'm not saying all of those donors fall under this description, but I'd be willing to bet a decent portion do. There are probably those who know full-well nothing would come of this and donated out of sympathy. I'd imagine those people are perfectly fine with the couple keeping their money. To emphasize (and reiterate), I'm not saying the whole group of donors falls under this umbrella. Of course good, sensible Christians exist. Never said they didn't. Only that it's not duckbear's (or DailyMail's, for that matter) responsibility to make note of them. If you folks are arguing that zealots don't exist today who would fall for this, then I've got a bridge to sell you. --- https://imgur.com/ZwO4qO2 Bluer than velvet was the night... Softer than satin was the light... From the stars... <cite>Far-Queue posted [p:933773833] in Christians... [t:78369737]...</cite> <quote>Disagree. For the aforementioned reasons: Far-Queue posted... </cite> <quote>You're assuming zealots operate within some frame of logic or normalcy </quote> Far-Queue posted... </cite> <quote>There are scores of people who believe that their god is capable of anything. Look at all those people that attend these churches where the pastor lays "healing hands" on ailing members of the congregation. Look up the numerous articles on parents who lost children to treatable illnesses when they turned to prayer to heal their kids instead of modern medicine.</quote> Far-Queue posted... </cite> <quote>Those who are fully indoctrinated in their faith have belief that runs so deep they believe in miracles against common sense or probability. Those types of people do not know how unlikely the outcome will be, because they believe their god and their faith will be rewarded against all improbable outcomes. Hence why you see people seeking faith healing over traditional medicine. To be clear, I'm not saying all of those donors fall under this description, but I'd be willing to bet a decent portion do. There are probably those who know full-well nothing would come of this and donated out of sympathy. I'd imagine those people are perfectly fine with the couple keeping their money.</quote> To emphasize (and reiterate), I'm not saying the whole group of donors falls under this umbrella. Of course good, sensible Christians exist. Never said they didn't. Only that it's not duckbear's (or DailyMail's, for that matter) responsibility to make note of them. If you folks are arguing that zealots don't exist today who would fall for this, then I've got a bridge to sell you. --- https://imgur.com/ZwO4qO2 Bluer than velvet was the night... Softer than satin was the light... From the stars...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1