LogFAQs > #937500012

ScritchOwl posted...

Do you not realize that phrasing causes people to be defensive. You could phrase that so many different ways and yet you chose to do so in a way to start a fight. Heck op could have ignored my post and continued on but he decided name calling was the way to go. Atleast I didn't post movie is for **********(insert slur of your choice) and thats it. I give you reasons and you dismiss them thats on you as thats your right heck plenty of movi is s I enjoy have metacritics below 50. I just voiced why I myself think the movie is poor and why I think that it got a poor score.

idk, it feels like your main gripe is just that you believe the film demonizes the rich people and glorifies the poor which is a valid take, in fact the film is meant for us to have different interpretations of it. The film does also show that the rich people have their own troubles and that being poor doesn't excuse the actions they take as well. It's just an all-around Shakespearean tragedy. Using it being unrealistic as criticism is really weird though, which is why my second sentence might've seemed a bit harsh. All fictional movies are unrealistic and compared to most movies it's fairly grounded.
---

Cherish me