LogFAQs > #944045457

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Outrage after Bella Thorne charged $200 for a NUDE Pic but it WASN'T Nude!!!
_AdjI_ 08/31/20 3:17:34 PM #21:	It does kind of sound like she ruined things for a lot of other models on the site, but frankly, even charging $50 for a single photo is taking advantage of people with poor impulse control, let alone $200. Album? Sure. Video? Potentially. But a single photo? That's just ridiculous even without considering how much the proliferation of free porn has devalued it. Capping single photos at $50 is still absurdly high, such that I don't think it was unreasonable to reduce the cap from being even more ridiculous. At that point, you're exploiting mental illness more so than anything else. Zeus posted... I don't support them and I don't really see it as legit work, Legalities aside, how would it not be legit work? <cite>_AdjI_ posted [p:944045457] in Outrage af... [t:78944054]...</cite> <quote>It does kind of sound like she ruined things for a lot of other models on the site, but frankly, even charging $50 for a single photo is taking advantage of people with poor impulse control, let alone $200. Album? Sure. Video? Potentially. But a single photo? That's just ridiculous even without considering how much the proliferation of free porn has devalued it. Capping single photos at $50 is still absurdly high, such that I don't think it was unreasonable to reduce the cap from being even more ridiculous. At that point, you're exploiting mental illness more so than anything else. Zeus posted... </cite> <quote>I don't support them and I don't really see it as legit work,</quote> Legalities aside, how would it not be legit work? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1