LogFAQs > #945176149

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Remember the climategate controversy?
scar the 1 09/28/20 7:01:09 AM #4:	apolloooo posted... The entire premise of anti intellectualism is taking things out of context and spreading it as literal fake news. I remember this article being used against gay rights campaign: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2015/10/no-scientists-have-not-found-the-gay-gene/410059/ The article simply said scientist can't pinpoint specific gene that is linked to homosexuality, but more of a complex combination of various DNA spread troughout the gene map, yet the idiots use at as the support of "homosexuality is a choice" bullshit. It is so effective in spreading false information sadly That's a good example because what conservatives succeeded with was framing the entire discussion around an assumption that being gay was bad. Like, even if it were a choice, it wouldn't change anything. But by taking that discussion, progressives opt in on the assumption that anyone who could choose should choose to be straight. --- Stop being so aggressively argumentative for no reason. - UnfairRepresent <cite>scar the 1 posted [p:945176149] in Remember t... [t:79004475]...</cite> <quote>apolloooo posted... </cite> <quote>The entire premise of anti intellectualism is taking things out of context and spreading it as literal fake news. I remember this article being used against gay rights campaign: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2015/10/no-scientists-have-not-found-the-gay-gene/410059/ The article simply said scientist can't pinpoint specific gene that is linked to homosexuality, but more of a complex combination of various DNA spread troughout the gene map, yet the idiots use at as the support of "homosexuality is a choice" bullshit. It is so effective in spreading false information sadly</quote>That's a good example because what conservatives succeeded with was framing the entire discussion around an assumption that being gay was bad. Like, even if it were a choice, it wouldn't change anything. But by taking that discussion, progressives opt in on the assumption that anyone who could choose should choose to be straight. --- Stop being so aggressively argumentative for no reason. - UnfairRepresent</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1