LogFAQs > #948290414

kevwaffles posted...

No, I've just decided to actually read what you post as you post it. I'm sorry that shifty eyes don't carry the full meaning you seem to want them to carry, or that you can't recognize the difference between "repeating the same overly simplistic generalization about the rest of the world outside the US until it magically becomes the abosulte truth" is anything close to what I was doing by calling him on it twice.

You still didnt even understand what I was saying if you added this on the end! Im disagreeing with the core conceit that repetition is bad/childish. If people dont seem to understand or dont debate the content of your posts, you try to rephrase them so they can at least understand where youre coming from. This is normal, and everyone in this topic does it all the time.

kevwaffles posted...

And I'm saying that you are looking at one point of time in a bubble and not only ignoring the context of why things were the way they were at that point (ie lack of perfect knowledge for a new disease), but also ignoring nine months of what he's done since. It would be like me narrowly focusing on one bad thing Bernie's ever said as reason that no one should ever like him and then being just completely confused as to why you and plenty of others still liked him.

First of all, I DIDNT ignore the context, Im the one who posted the context in the last topic!

Secondly, this all started because I said I dont get the liberal worship of this guy, and you have gotten so wrapped up in...whatever this is, that you literally said Im saying he alone is the scum of the Earth.

As Ive acknowledged if youd actually read my posts Kev, there are extenuating circumstances AND sure, his response was not unreasonable, but that doesnt make it not what it was, a mistake.

Theres literally no reason to get so heated defending a guy from my unreasonable criticism of I dont think he did the right thing.

And of course here come the Bernie comparisons. Cant just address my comments, have to go on the attack.

kevwaffles posted...

Well when you say, and again I quote, 'You are actually arguing that doing the wrong thing had no effect', I can only assume you're talking about my actual arguments. Since you're using quote marks to attribute a statement to me that I have never once said, I'm gonna have a hard time responding to whatever you've dreamed up in the way you want me to.

Gonna be real, I have no idea how any of this translates to you thinking foolmo and I are calling you anti mask

---

Phantom Dust.
"I'll just wait for time to prove me right again." - Vlado