LogFAQs > #951900058

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Raetsel continues ranking 631 songs (+ extra songs) [Rankings]
Raetsel_Lapin 03/19/21 8:16:02 PM #294:	Mr Lasastryke posted... you could also try this two-and-a-half hour version (featuring jeroen van veen): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-4bh8J84Go Since that was the version actually posted abd I wanted an excuse to spend two and a half hours on something that took minimal effort, I went ahead and watched the full thing. It's... not exactly for me, but I didn't really dislike it either. Probably an exact 50 type of song? Thinking I may want a "maximum of 20 minutes per song" rule in the future though, whatever format the next formal ranking takes. --- Temporary Signature <cite>Raetsel_Lapin posted [p:951900058] in Raetsel co... [t:79231059]...</cite> <quote>Mr Lasastryke posted...</cite> <quote>you could also try this two-and-a-half hour version (featuring jeroen van veen): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-4bh8J84Go </quote> Since that was the version actually posted abd I wanted an excuse to spend two and a half hours on something that took minimal effort, I went ahead and watched the full thing. It's... not exactly for me, but I didn't really dislike it either. Probably an exact 50 type of song? Thinking I may want a "maximum of 20 minutes per song" rule in the future though, whatever format the next formal ranking takes. --- Temporary Signature</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1