LogFAQs > #959165722

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
Topic#MeToo ALERT: Hooter Girls complains about new Outfits being 'Too Skimpy'...
Conner4REAL
10/18/21 6:20:24 PM
#26:


pionear posted...
Not if they are already working there...then the Company ask you to reveal even more or risk losing your job

It's no different than an Actress signing on for a Love Scene, then the Director later on during filming telling him/her they will be replaced if they don't do an 'Oral' (real or fake) scene


your analogy is crap for your claim. Its not nudity or sex here and that is established as something completely different in Hollywood which has requires a specific nudity rider.

Actually your analogy supports MY point.

the actress didnt sign on for a love scene and its changed. Here the girls signed on to wear a skimpy uniform, there was no nudity there still is none.

the fact that they were already working there is irrelevant. An employer can change the uniforms of employees at any time. If a fried chicken place all of a sudden decided all their employees dress like chickens then too bad.

---
"I pet my dog I don't eat it" ~ Lemone
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1