Wrong letter? Again, the very first sentence of my first post (Post #104 since I guess you haven't seen it) literally says, "I dont really agree with this author." That is literally the first sentence. Do you understand now? And I won't agree...
And it was relevant to the conversation. You seem to think it wasn't for whatever reason... And the point wasn't that there were relationships where people are happy with people playing video games. That just proves you aren't really reading what I'm saying if that's all you got from it. The point was that excessive of a lot can mean different things to different people...
It was vague information, which is not enough to actually go off of. I can say I go to work on a base. But with that information, you still wouldn't know where I work. Vague information can only give you so much. Which is why I said we need MORE information... And no, it's not enough to actually go off of... We barely know anything about the relationship... It wasn't even 10 sentences. You shouldn't be able to sum up an relationship in 10 seconds. Especially the problems... So, no. It was nowhere near enough information...
Except no. All those reasons can't be ignored. Unless you just want to be a shitty SO and person... Trying to actually see if there's a problem for all of that would be better. Maybe there is something simple that can fix it. Or maybe she hasn't even communicated herself to him. Or maybe there's a bigger problem she doesn't know about... That's the thing. It seems like something changed, or else she probably wouldn't have started dating him in the first place. So, when did they change happened? And can you find out what caused it?
And I'm not trying to spin it. We literally have barely any information. And have only heard one side, which is her side. And most people will tell a story to make them look like a good guy, and the other person as the problem... Sitcoms make fun of stuff like that, but it's something that's actually happens in real life. People sometimes paint themselves in a better light...
And the thing is, I'm not making up random information. I've literally been saying we don't have enough information. Or it could be "blank" because we don't know... I'm giving alternatives, because we don't know. And maybe the conversation could work. But we have no idea if she's had it, or if she will even try...
And again, I just don't agree with the list. I think the reason behind those 12 signs need to be explored before the author just says these mean he's a manchild... And I think you would need more than a quarter to actually qualify...
Ok I'm new to this conversation with you but it definitely seems like you are making assumptions that benefit the guy... or more specifically downplay his faults. Why are you assuming she hasn't talked to him about these issues? Why do you assume he *was* doing his own laundry before? Why do you assume that because you explain why you need help everyone does? Why do you assume their definitions of 'excessive time playing video games' is the actual issue, and not him choosing to play them and avoid intimacy with her?