LogFAQs > #961101351

Kyuubi4269 posted...

If your country taught your own history, you'd know we abandoned the US to fight the French as the US was a loss maker, it wasn't worth keeping.

And yet the Brits continued to fight the Americans. Funny how that worked. Similarly funny that fighting another war to keep Canada (where I'm actually from, you silly goose) was worthwhile, despite their considerable geographical similarity. It's almost like the issue wasn't actually that the US wasn't worth keeping, it was that it wasn't worth drawing out a losing war over.

Kyuubi4269 posted...

Britain includes Scotland, and Scotland's children all have Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, their brains don't exactly work right.

Based on a quick google, Scotland's FASD incidence is around 3-5%, while the most robust study I could find for England found a 17% incidence. You should really check statistics before letting your slavering nationalism make you look silly like that.

Kyuubi4269 posted...

There is nothing superior about gratuitous french

There's nothing gratuitous about using french words for french phrases. "En masse" means "in bulk," which makes actual sense in this context. "On mass" means you're sitting on Catholics, which doesn't make sense much of anywhere.

Kyuubi4269 posted...

Unlike you, I speak French, however since I'm speaking on an English speaking site, English is most appropriate.

If you wanted to speak English instead of French, you should have spoken English, not spoken French but written it using the closest available English homophones. That's never the most appropriate choice, and instead just means you're joining the ranks of "bone apple teeth" and "koo day tah."

Heck, even "in mass" would have been a valid sentence, but you chose to pretend you were speaking French with English words for some reason.