LogFAQs > #962075315

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	9 y/o Sobs UNCONTROLLABLY as she and 6 ANTI-VAXXERS are ARRESTED!!!
LinkPizza 01/25/22 7:21:57 PM #54:	SKARDAVNELNATE posted... Rather strange that adgl focused on them then. You seemed more focused on them then he is, tbh... SKARDAVNELNATE posted... This bit is not clear. You want to arrest the peaceful majority? Obviously a typo. Which should be obvious based on my other post. And the fact that it wouldn't make any sense to split them up from the non-peaceful protesters if I thought both groups should be arrested... SKARDAVNELNATE posted... This bit is not clear. You want to arrest people who didn't protest? Oh. So you're pretending to be dumb, I see... The one who are protesting, but not peacefully should be arrested. We are talking about protesters. But I didn't realize you needed people to actually talk to you like you were a child. But I now realize that now... Sorry for the confusion... SKARDAVNELNATE posted... This is where we disagree. And this is what adgl failed to address. News reports focused on the ratio of peacefulness of the protests. It was an overwhelming aspect to their coverage of the not peaceful parts of the protests. It holds significance. What the majority does doesn't matter when talking about who to arrest, though. You keep trying to say if the majority is peaceful, no one should be arrested. And that's false. The protesters who are protesting, but not peacefully, should be arrested regardless of whether or not the majority of protesters are peaceful or not. What other people are doing doesn't matter. What the non-peaceful protesters are dong does... SKARDAVNELNATE posted... My post didn't say to arrest the peaceful majority. Talking about arresting the peaceful majority isn't the subject. It's whether to arrest or not the remaining people that we're talking about. I didn't say you post said to arrest them. I was saying that his post was different from yours. Your post said to not arrest anyone if the majority was peaceful. That's wrong. Hs post said to not arrest the peaceful protesters, but implied that you arrest the non-peaceful protesters... Which is correct... SKARDAVNELNATE posted... Again, this is where we disagree and what was not addressed in the post. It was heavily implied, though. You seemed to have trouble understanding that, though. So, its not wonder you have trouble understanding what he implied... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:962075315] in 9 y/o Sobs... [t:79865413]...</cite> <quote>SKARDAVNELNATE posted...</cite> <quote>Rather strange that adgl focused on them then.</quote> You seemed more focused on them then he is, tbh... SKARDAVNELNATE posted...</cite> <quote>This bit is not clear. You want to arrest the peaceful majority?</quote> Obviously a typo. Which should be obvious based on my other post. And the fact that it wouldn't make any sense to split them up from the non-peaceful protesters if I thought both groups should be arrested... SKARDAVNELNATE posted...</cite> <quote>This bit is not clear. You want to arrest people who didn't protest?</quote> Oh. So you're pretending to be dumb, I see... The one who are protesting, but not peacefully should be arrested. We are talking about protesters. But I didn't realize you needed people to actually talk to you like you were a child. But I now realize that now... Sorry for the confusion... SKARDAVNELNATE posted...</cite> <quote>This is where we disagree. And this is what adgl failed to address. News reports focused on the ratio of peacefulness of the protests. It was an overwhelming aspect to their coverage of the not peaceful parts of the protests. It holds significance.</quote> What the majority does doesn't matter when talking about who to arrest, though. You keep trying to say if the majority is peaceful, no one should be arrested. And that's false. The protesters who are protesting, but not peacefully, should be arrested regardless of whether or not the majority of protesters are peaceful or not. What other people are doing doesn't matter. What the non-peaceful protesters are dong does... SKARDAVNELNATE posted...</cite> <quote>My post didn't say to arrest the peaceful majority. Talking about arresting the peaceful majority isn't the subject. It's whether to arrest or not the remaining people that we're talking about.</quote> I didn't say you post said to arrest them. I was saying that his post was different from yours. Your post said to not arrest anyone if the majority was peaceful. That's wrong. Hs post said to not arrest the peaceful protesters, but implied that you arrest the non-peaceful protesters... Which is correct... SKARDAVNELNATE posted...</cite> <quote>Again, this is where we disagree and what was not addressed in the post.</quote> It was heavily implied, though. You seemed to have trouble understanding that, though. So, its not wonder you have trouble understanding what he implied... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1