LogFAQs > #962082664

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	9 y/o Sobs UNCONTROLLABLY as she and 6 ANTI-VAXXERS are ARRESTED!!!
SKARDAVNELNATE 01/26/22 12:22:32 AM #61:	LinkPizza posted... He's saying to only arrest the non-peaceful protesters. adgl stated "So long as they're mostly peaceful, there are no grounds for arresting most of the people present". I don't know how you interpret this to refer to anything other than the peaceful ones. I didn't say they should be arrested. Yet he had to explain why they shouldn't be? LinkPizza posted... You really have that much trouble reading the part you replied to? No, I'm having difficulty applying it to the larger conversation because of the reasons I already gave. LinkPizza posted... I'm probably saying that the part you said wasn't addressed in the post was implied. And that part would be the part about arresting the non-peaceful protesters. He implied that he thinks the non-peaceful protesters should be arrested. He implied this by talking about arresting the peaceful ones too. Have I got these details correct so far? What I did say was that because of the association with an act of protest the not peaceful ones shouldn't be arrested either. adgl's argument appears to be that it's difficult to arrest them. But that doesn't matter because it says nothing in regard to why they should be arrested. You claim my response to adgl didn't address what he said in the quote. His response didn't address what I said when he quoted me. Which is a habit of his. LinkPizza posted... Unless you were talking about something different... I was talking about how the right to protest applies to the story. adgl appears to be talking about how difficult it is to arrest a large number of people. So far I don't see how he's connecting the one to the other. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB <cite>SKARDAVNELNATE posted [p:962082664] in 9 y/o Sobs... [t:79865413]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>He's saying to only arrest the non-peaceful protesters.</quote>adgl stated "So long as they're mostly peaceful, there are no grounds for arresting most of the people present". I don't know how you interpret this to refer to anything other than the peaceful ones. I didn't say they should be arrested. Yet he had to explain why they shouldn't be? LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>You really have that much trouble reading the part you replied to?</quote>No, I'm having difficulty applying it to the larger conversation because of the reasons I already gave. LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>I'm probably saying that the part you said wasn't addressed in the post was implied. And that part would be the part about arresting the non-peaceful protesters.</quote>He implied that he thinks the non-peaceful protesters should be arrested. He implied this by talking about arresting the peaceful ones too. Have I got these details correct so far? What I did say was that because of the association with an act of protest the not peaceful ones shouldn't be arrested either. adgl's argument appears to be that it's difficult to arrest them. But that doesn't matter because it says nothing in regard to why they should be arrested. You claim my response to adgl didn't address what he said in the quote. His response didn't address what I said when he quoted me. Which is a habit of his. LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>Unless you were talking about something different...</quote>I was talking about how the right to protest applies to the story. adgl appears to be talking about how difficult it is to arrest a large number of people. So far I don't see how he's connecting the one to the other. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1