LogFAQs > #962088860

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	9 y/o Sobs UNCONTROLLABLY as she and 6 ANTI-VAXXERS are ARRESTED!!!
SKARDAVNELNATE 01/26/22 9:19:10 AM #65:	LinkPizza posted... He never said anything about arresting the peaceful ones. adjl stated "there are no grounds for arresting most of the people present". Most of the people are peaceful. Why would he need to say there is no grounds for arresting them when no one was talking about arresting them? LinkPizza posted... That's not how that should work, nor is that how it works... How it should work is a subject for debate. How it does work is not since you can just look at the reality of what has happened. The reality being that there was public support for the violence. LinkPizza posted... The non-peaceful one should definitely be arrested... I have given examples of society expressing that they shouldn't be. Which adjl is either unaware of or intentionally ignoring. LinkPizza posted... Because his post was correcting you post. Which he didn't. He stated nothing to demonstrate why his interpretation is right and mine is wrong. He's not even on the same subject. I'm talking about social forces blatantly showing approval for the violence. He's talking about logistics. Which is something that you don't seem to understand. LinkPizza posted... They're both talking about who to not arrest. We have two statements. Violent people in a protest don't get arrested. There is no reason to arrest the peaceful protesters. Both statements are about not arresting someone. This much is accurate. What is not accurate is that the second statement corrects or has any bearing on the first statement. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB <cite>SKARDAVNELNATE posted [p:962088860] in 9 y/o Sobs... [t:79865413]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>He never said anything about arresting the peaceful ones.</quote>adjl stated "there are no grounds for arresting most of the people present". Most of the people are peaceful. Why would he need to say there is no grounds for arresting them when no one was talking about arresting them? LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>That's not how that should work, nor is that how it works...</quote>How it should work is a subject for debate. How it does work is not since you can just look at the reality of what has happened. The reality being that there was public support for the violence. LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>The non-peaceful one should definitely be arrested...</quote>I have given examples of society expressing that they shouldn't be. Which adjl is either unaware of or intentionally ignoring. LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>Because his post was correcting you post.</quote>Which he didn't. He stated nothing to demonstrate why his interpretation is right and mine is wrong. He's not even on the same subject. I'm talking about social forces blatantly showing approval for the violence. He's talking about logistics. Which is something that you don't seem to understand. LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>They're both talking about who to not arrest.</quote>We have two statements. Violent people in a protest don't get arrested. There is no reason to arrest the peaceful protesters. Both statements are about not arresting someone. This much is accurate. What is not accurate is that the second statement corrects or has any bearing on the first statement. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1