LogFAQs > #962090385

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	9 y/o Sobs UNCONTROLLABLY as she and 6 ANTI-VAXXERS are ARRESTED!!!
LinkPizza 01/26/22 10:30:32 AM #66:	SKARDAVNELNATE posted... adjl stated "there are no grounds for arresting most of the people present". Most of the people are peaceful. Why would he need to say there is no grounds for arresting them when no one was talking about arresting them? The reason he said that is because he saying not to arrest the peaceful protesters since most of them would be peaceful in that scenario. And hes talking about arresting the non-peaceful ones. Thats how most people would read that because thats how its meant to be read. You have already shown to not understand how to read anything not directly told you you already. So, that should make things clear for you So, again, he never said anything about arresting the peaceful ones SKARDAVNELNATE posted... How it should work is a subject for debate. How it does work is not since you can just look at the reality of what has happened. The reality being that there was public support for the violence. How it should work is not up for debate at all. People should absolutely not eat a free pass to commit crimes just because they are in a group of other people who are not committing crimes. Anyone who thinks that isnt thinking at all There was also not public support of violence. Some people wanted violence. Those were the bad people. Most people were just protesting, though. And people were supporting the protest, but not then on-peaceful ones. So, again, thats not how it works, or how it should work SKARDAVNELNATE posted... I have given examples of society expressing that they shouldn't be. Which adjl is either unaware of or intentionally ignoring. And those examples have been shit. He explained why it was hard to actually arrest them. Most people actually want the non-peaceful ones to be arrested. Especially since it makes it harder for their protest to actually work SKARDAVNELNATE posted... Which he didn't. He stated nothing to demonstrate why his interpretation is right and mine is wrong. He's not even on the same subject. I'm talking about social forces blatantly showing approval for the violence. He's talking about logistics. Which is something that you don't seem to understand. Except he absolutely did correct you. What you said was wrong. And what he said was right You were wrong for thinking non-peaceful protesters should get a free pass just because the protesters around them were peaceful. He was right that the peaceful shouldnt be arrested, but the non-peaceful ones should be arrested And the subjects are the same, even if youre talking about different parts of the same subject, which is something that you dont seem to understand SKARDAVNELNATE posted... We have two statements. Violent people in a protest don't get arrested. There is no reason to arrest the peaceful protesters. Both statements are about not arresting someone. This much is accurate. What is not accurate is that the second statement corrects or has any bearing on the first statement. The whole statement is correct. You have to start using your common sense to see that both things are talking about the same thing. Of course, you seem to have been trolling throughout this topic, so youll probably still pretend to not understand --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:962090385] in 9 y/o Sobs... [t:79865413]...</cite> <quote>SKARDAVNELNATE posted...</cite> <quote>adjl stated "there are no grounds for arresting most of the people present". Most of the people are peaceful. Why would he need to say there is no grounds for arresting them when no one was talking about arresting them?</quote> The reason he said that is because he saying not to arrest the peaceful protesters since most of them would be peaceful in that scenario. And hes talking about arresting the non-peaceful ones. Thats how most people would read that because thats how its meant to be read. You have already shown to not understand how to read anything not directly told you you already. So, that should make things clear for you So, again, he never said anything about arresting the peaceful ones SKARDAVNELNATE posted...</cite> <quote>How it should work is a subject for debate. How it does work is not since you can just look at the reality of what has happened. The reality being that there was public support for the violence.</quote> How it should work is not up for debate at all. People should absolutely not eat a free pass to commit crimes just because they are in a group of other people who are not committing crimes. Anyone who thinks that isnt thinking at all There was also not public support of violence. Some people wanted violence. Those were the bad people. Most people were just protesting, though. And people were supporting the protest, but not then on-peaceful ones. So, again, thats not how it works, or how it should work SKARDAVNELNATE posted...</cite> <quote>I have given examples of society expressing that they shouldn't be. Which adjl is either unaware of or intentionally ignoring.</quote> And those examples have been shit. He explained why it was hard to actually arrest them. Most people actually want the non-peaceful ones to be arrested. Especially since it makes it harder for their protest to actually work SKARDAVNELNATE posted...</cite> <quote>Which he didn't. He stated nothing to demonstrate why his interpretation is right and mine is wrong. He's not even on the same subject. I'm talking about social forces blatantly showing approval for the violence. He's talking about logistics. Which is something that you don't seem to understand.</quote> Except he absolutely did correct you. What you said was wrong. And what he said was right You were wrong for thinking non-peaceful protesters should get a free pass just because the protesters around them were peaceful. He was right that the peaceful shouldnt be arrested, but the non-peaceful ones should be arrested And the subjects are the same, even if youre talking about different parts of the same subject, which is something that you dont seem to understand SKARDAVNELNATE posted...</cite> <quote>We have two statements. Violent people in a protest don't get arrested. There is no reason to arrest the peaceful protesters. Both statements are about not arresting someone. This much is accurate. What is not accurate is that the second statement corrects or has any bearing on the first statement.</quote> The whole statement is correct. You have to start using your common sense to see that both things are talking about the same thing. Of course, you seem to have been trolling throughout this topic, so youll probably still pretend to not understand --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1