LogFAQs > #37566

LurkerFAQs ( 06.29.2011-09.11.2012 ), Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicAoD 970: LMS needs to be banned from AoD Noms
Azp2k32
06/30/11 1:27:00 PM
#85:


GenesisSaga posted...
^Well said. I'm still against banning his nominations on the grounds that it's a bit extreme, but something seriously needs to be done (e.g. denom system needs to be amped up or noms need to be limited- especially in LMS's and perhaps Ulti's case(s)) before we end up with a cluttered list of inequalities. The current denom system isn't effective enough imo. And no we should not encourage certain people to nominate "whatever the hell they like" because it's really in no one's best interests to waste everyone's time.

^^

At the point where you get 3 nominations and 1 denomination per person, what ends up happening is someone who commonly gets denominated has further incentive to use all 3 slots to get ahead. Not that I think LMS would necessarily use less nominations even if denominations were removed, but still. It also takes more effort to denominate than to randomly nominate crap repeatedly.

I think the answer here is just move nominations down to 1 per person per topic to reduce the massive spam-filled nomination list. If we get starved for nominations later on down the line, the change can be reverted but for now it'd be a worthwhile experiment.

--
http://www.nbc.com/parks-and-recreation/exclusives/ron-dancing-animated.gif
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1