How about the time Paul wouldn't use the bathroom of a gay person?
He has limited control over his personal feelings, and in any case it is irrelevant. What is relevant are his political positions, over which he has full control.
Or his support of Abortion laws?
Good.
Or the fact that if Japan had not bombed us he wouldn't have joined the war?
That puts him in line with FDR and most of America in 1941, so it's not really controversial.
Or him being against sexual harassment laws at work?
This sounds bad, but what exactly are these sexual harassment laws? Are they fair laws that protect people without capriciously punishing others? Congress passes bad laws that sound good all the time. It's very hard to oppose them because they sound good, and that's why Congress has put us in such a bad position today. I don't know if I favor these particular laws that Paul is against without further research, but I would not be surprised if I agreed with him here.
Or his opposition to the Voting Rights Act or Civil Rights act?
Probably on uber strict construction states rights grounds.
--
Congratulations to SuperNiceDog, Guru Winner, who was smart enough to pick
your 7 time champion, Link.