LogFAQs > #876786239

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	HD Time-synced bodycam video from December 3rd arrest.
DawkinsNumber4 04/08/17 9:10:54 AM #110:	Dragonblade01 posted... DawkinsNumber4 posted... Dragonblade01 posted... And again, you are overconfident based exclusively on your supposed reading ability. No "supposed" to it. It is important to properly understand what one is reading. I can do that better than most and this has been factually proven. I also figured as much prior to it being factually proven after noticing for much of my life that people have no clue what the fuck they are reading more times than one would expect. It is most definitely "supposed." What you have is a test in which you scored within a very high percentile. Taking that result and assuming you are always right about something on the sole basis that you were the person interpreting the information is being classically overconfident. If my sentence comprehension tested in the 97th percentile just recently here in January, and I have been WTFing my whole life at how people comprehend shit, and if I am in the 97th percentile (that roughly means out of every 100 people I comprehend what I read better than all but 3 of them) then what does that tell you? let me remind you the average IQ in the US is only 98, not 100. The location with the highest average IQ is Hong Kong with an average IQ of 108. Taking all of this information into effect it becomes more likely that 3 out of 100 comprehending better becomes less than that (however less that may be, if it goes along with total IQ [not saying it does] then that would be 1 out of every 100 or less.) It makes a lot of sense honestly. I always go back and re-read just in case but no if I am reading incorrectly then it should be simple enough to explain the actual meaning but if one cannot then it means it is not likely that person is correct, however there is always the fallacy fallacy. --- https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board <cite>DawkinsNumber4 posted [p:876786239] in HD Time-sy... [t:75212601]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dragonblade01 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DawkinsNumber4 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dragonblade01 posted...</cite> <quote>And again, you are overconfident based exclusively on your supposed reading ability.</quote> No "supposed" to it. It is important to properly understand what one is reading. I can do that better than most and this has been factually proven. I also figured as much prior to it being factually proven after noticing for much of my life that people have no clue what the fuck they are reading more times than one would expect.</quote> It is most definitely "supposed." What you have is a test in which you scored within a very high percentile. Taking that result and assuming you are always right about something on the sole basis that you were the person interpreting the information is being classically overconfident.</quote> If my sentence comprehension tested in the 97th percentile just recently here in January, and I have been WTFing my whole life at how people comprehend shit, and if I am in the 97th percentile (that roughly means out of every 100 people I comprehend what I read better than all but 3 of them) then what does that tell you? let me remind you the average IQ in the US is only 98, not 100. The location with the highest average IQ is Hong Kong with an average IQ of 108. Taking all of this information into effect it becomes more likely that 3 out of 100 comprehending better becomes less than that (however less that may be, if it goes along with total IQ [not saying it does] then that would be 1 out of every 100 or less.) It makes a lot of sense honestly. I always go back and re-read just in case but no if I am reading incorrectly then it should be simple enough to explain the actual meaning but if one cannot then it means it is not likely that person is correct, however there is always the fallacy fallacy. --- https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1