LogFAQs > #880222052

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Should Trump be impeached?
Zeus 06/01/17 4:31:29 PM #73:	jamieyello3 posted... Zues shut the hell up about me being a troll. You're the only one who thinks that because I'm one of the few posters who even bothers responding to you anymore. You call me a troll because that's easier than defending Trump against his own words. >Pretends that nobody responds to me >Claims that he's not a troll darkknight109 posted... Zeus posted... Honestly, he's no worse than anybody else and the hyperbolic claims about that are silly. Agreed. I mean, aside from the multitude of ways he is demonstrably worse and in way over his head, he`s totally the greatest. Except he's not demonstrably worse nor has anybody claimed he's the greatest. Not even Trump himself has claimed that he's the greatest and he's got an ego bigger than his skyscrapers. BlackScythe0 posted... DirtBasedSoap posted... slacker03150 posted... Even if there is nothing to the Russia scandal, the evidence shows that he has tried to intimidate witnesses, silence journalists, and stop an investigation against him, so even if we end up with mike pence, I think impeachment would be fair at this point. So if it turns out he's innocent he should still be impeached? lolwut He would still be guilty of Obstruction of Justice. "Silencing journalists" -- which isn't a thing in this case -- in no way constitutes obstruction. He did nothing to stop an "investigation against him," especially since he wasn't solely being investigated nor is Comey solely investigating him. And the alleged threat was made in a fucking tweet -_- HornedLion posted... The real impeachable offense was 2 weeks ago and had nothing to do with obstruction, Comey, FBI, Russia, Tweets, none of that. It had to do when he ordered that attack. President CANNOT just attack countries WITHOUT the consent of Congress unless we have been attacked first. We're in peace time. Now, we can argue that the republicans would've probably made it pass anyway but... that's not how it works. I can't assume that my swinger friend is probably gonna be fine with me banging his wife and do it before I ask him. Ordered which attack? Syria? Even if you could somehow claim that's not within the president's powers, previous presidents have literally ordered strikes without congressional approval. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash <cite>Zeus posted [p:880222052] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>jamieyello3 posted...</cite> <quote>Zues shut the hell up about me being a troll. You're the only one who thinks that because I'm one of the few posters who even bothers responding to you anymore. You call me a troll because that's easier than defending Trump against his own words.</quote> >Pretends that nobody responds to me >Claims that he's not a troll <cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Honestly, he's no worse than anybody else and the hyperbolic claims about that are silly.</quote> Agreed. I mean, aside from the multitude of ways he is demonstrably worse and in way over his head, he`s totally the greatest.</quote> Except he's not demonstrably worse nor has anybody claimed he's the greatest. Not even Trump himself has claimed that he's the greatest and he's got an ego bigger than his skyscrapers. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DirtBasedSoap posted...</cite> <quote><cite>slacker03150 posted...</cite> <quote>Even if there is nothing to the Russia scandal, the evidence shows that he has tried to intimidate witnesses, silence journalists, and stop an investigation against him, so even if we end up with mike pence, I think impeachment would be fair at this point.</quote> So if it turns out he's innocent he should still be impeached? lolwut</quote> He would still be guilty of Obstruction of Justice.</quote> "Silencing journalists" -- which isn't a thing in this case -- in no way constitutes obstruction. He did nothing to stop an "investigation against him," especially since he wasn't solely being investigated nor is Comey solely investigating him. And the alleged threat was made in a fucking tweet -_- <cite>HornedLion posted...</cite> <quote>The real impeachable offense was 2 weeks ago and had nothing to do with obstruction, Comey, FBI, Russia, Tweets, none of that. It had to do when he ordered that attack. President CANNOT just attack countries WITHOUT the consent of Congress unless we have been attacked first. We're in peace time. Now, we can argue that the republicans would've probably made it pass anyway but... that's not how it works. I can't assume that my swinger friend is probably gonna be fine with me banging his wife and do it before I ask him.</quote> Ordered which attack? Syria? Even if you could somehow claim that's not within the president's powers, previous presidents have literally ordered strikes without congressional approval. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1