Poll of the Day > Should Trump be impeached?

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
Northern_Star 05/24/17 12:30:06 PM #1:	yes or no --- I love girls' feet. The foot fetishist atheist of GameFAQs. <cite>Northern_Star posted [p:879721092] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>yes or no</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
jamieyello3 05/24/17 12:36:19 PM #2:	Yes I'm gonna be honest, the Comey Russia scandel is a much bigger deal than gay Muslim Obama being born in Kenya during a Satanist ritual, and frankly I'll take Pence, he's probably much more intelligent. Trump might the dumbest president we've ever had. Pretty sure he was a plant by the Clintons that went catastrophically wrong. He's like Wheatley from Portal 2. Trump outright came out and stated he fired Comey for looking into him when his administration was pushing another story that was supposed to be a cover-up. Not that it will happen with the Republican senate. <cite>jamieyello3 posted [p:879721468] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>Yes I'm gonna be honest, the Comey Russia scandel is a much bigger deal than gay Muslim Obama being born in Kenya during a Satanist ritual, and frankly I'll take Pence, he's probably much more intelligent. Trump might the dumbest president we've ever had. Pretty sure he was a plant by the Clintons that went catastrophically wrong. He's like Wheatley from Portal 2. Trump outright came out and stated he fired Comey for looking into him when his administration was pushing another story that was supposed to be a cover-up. Not that it will happen with the Republican senate.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 05/24/17 12:44:35 PM #3:	Yes, I expect impeachment will begin by the end of the year. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:879721954] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>Yes, I expect impeachment will begin by the end of the year.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Muffinz0rz 05/24/17 2:59:00 PM #4:	Hard to take a foot fetishist topic seriously --- Not changing this sig until Pat Benatar is in Super Smash Bros. (Started 8/31/2010) BRAVELY DEFAULT: 1075 - 0844 - 9134 + FS: Pumkaboo, Lampent, Dusclops. <cite>Muffinz0rz posted [p:879730180] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>Hard to take a foot fetishist topic seriously</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
papercup 05/24/17 3:00:58 PM #5:	No! Long live the emperor! Long may he reign! --- Nintendo Network ID: papercups 3DS FC: 4124 5916 9925 <cite>papercup posted [p:879730284] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>No! Long live the emperor! Long may he reign!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Person106 05/24/17 3:05:11 PM #6:	grabs the leftover election popcorn --- https://supermariomakerbookmark.nintendo.net/profile/person106 <cite>Person106 posted [p:879730512] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>grabs the leftover election popcorn</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
slacker03150 05/24/17 3:22:02 PM #7:	Even if there is nothing to the Russia scandal, the evidence shows that he has tried to intimidate witnesses, silence journalists, and stop an investigation against him, so even if we end up with mike pence, I think impeachment would be fair at this point. --- I am awesome and so are you. Lenny gone but not forgotten. - 12/10/2015 <cite>slacker03150 posted [p:879731523] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>Even if there is nothing to the Russia scandal, the evidence shows that he has tried to intimidate witnesses, silence journalists, and stop an investigation against him, so even if we end up with mike pence, I think impeachment would be fair at this point.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Muffinz0rz 05/24/17 3:30:32 PM #8:	Make sure to buy stock in electroshock homosexual conversion therapy camps if impeachment starts --- Not changing this sig until Pat Benatar is in Super Smash Bros. (Started 8/31/2010) BRAVELY DEFAULT: 1075 - 0844 - 9134 + FS: Pumkaboo, Lampent, Dusclops. <cite>Muffinz0rz posted [p:879732039] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>Make sure to buy stock in electroshock homosexual conversion therapy camps if impeachment starts</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
J_Dawg983 05/24/17 3:31:21 PM #9:	Yes, he doesn't even care about feelings. --- RSN: Pridefc PSN: Jaosin <cite>J_Dawg983 posted [p:879732086] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>Yes, he doesn't even care about feelings.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 05/24/17 3:53:43 PM #10:	Thus far it hasn't been proven that he's done anything illegal - I'm content to wait until the various probes and investigations finish and report their findings before I make the call on whether impeachment is worthwhile. Honestly, though, I'm conflicted. On the one hand, Trump is bad for the country - and bad for the world - which makes me root for impeachment; on the other hand, his potential replacements in Pence and Ryan (if Pence winds up impeached too) I suspect would be far more damaging in the long run, which makes me root for Trump to stay in office as the buffoonish fop who can't get anything done. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:879733446] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>Thus far it hasn't been proven that he's done anything illegal - I'm content to wait until the various probes and investigations finish and report their findings before I make the call on whether impeachment is worthwhile. Honestly, though, I'm conflicted. On the one hand, Trump is bad for the country - and bad for the world - which makes me root for impeachment; on the other hand, his potential replacements in Pence and Ryan (if Pence winds up impeached too) I suspect would be far more damaging in the long run, which makes me root for Trump to stay in office as the buffoonish fop who can't get anything done.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 05/24/17 3:54:25 PM #11:	Depends on what they find from the investigations. Based on things he himself has said, it sure seems like it. --- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mead "I'm Mary Poppins ya'll!" <cite>Mead posted [p:879733495] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>Depends on what they find from the investigations. Based on things he himself has said, it sure seems like it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JixHedgehog 05/24/17 4:21:11 PM #12:	As of right now, no Until someone can come up with some credible evidence that he broke a law he's fine --- Not changing my sig until Nintendo announces the Switch XL 1/12/2017 <cite>JixHedgehog posted [p:879735139] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>As of right now, no Until someone can come up with some credible evidence that he broke a law he's fine</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 05/24/17 4:41:31 PM #13:	JixHedgehog posted... As of right now, no Until someone can come up with some credible evidence that he broke a law he's fine Obstruction of justice. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:879736287] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>JixHedgehog posted...</cite> <quote>As of right now, no Until someone can come up with some credible evidence that he broke a law he's fine</quote> Obstruction of justice.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 05/24/17 4:48:33 PM #14:	BlackScythe0 posted... JixHedgehog posted... As of right now, no Until someone can come up with some credible evidence that he broke a law he's fine Obstruction of justice. Based on what's on the table right now, an Obstruction cause likely would not stick. There's some circumstantial evidence, and a whole lot of hearsay floating around, but the concrete evidence is still pretty thin. Be patient and let investigators do their work. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:879736682] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JixHedgehog posted...</cite> <quote>As of right now, no Until someone can come up with some credible evidence that he broke a law he's fine</quote> Obstruction of justice.</quote> Based on what's on the table right now, an Obstruction cause likely would not stick. There's some circumstantial evidence, and a whole lot of hearsay floating around, but the concrete evidence is still pretty thin. Be patient and let investigators do their work.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 05/24/17 4:56:26 PM #15:	darkknight109 posted... BlackScythe0 posted... JixHedgehog posted... As of right now, no Until someone can come up with some credible evidence that he broke a law he's fine Obstruction of justice. Based on what's on the table right now, an Obstruction cause likely would not stick. There's some circumstantial evidence, and a whole lot of hearsay floating around, but the concrete evidence is still pretty thin. Be patient and let investigators do their work. Oh they are going to find worse, he was just saying there is no credible evidence of anything he could be impeached for. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:879737202] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JixHedgehog posted...</cite> <quote>As of right now, no Until someone can come up with some credible evidence that he broke a law he's fine</quote> Obstruction of justice.</quote> Based on what's on the table right now, an Obstruction cause likely would not stick. There's some circumstantial evidence, and a whole lot of hearsay floating around, but the concrete evidence is still pretty thin. Be patient and let investigators do their work.</quote> Oh they are going to find worse, he was just saying there is no credible evidence of anything he could be impeached for.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MrZAP17 05/24/17 5:02:29 PM #16:	I guess we're all just forgetting about emoluments now. The guy has more than one problem. --- "The truth is rarely pure and never simple." <cite>MrZAP17 posted [p:879737596] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>I guess we're all just forgetting about emoluments now. The guy has more than one problem.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 05/24/17 5:06:27 PM #17:	darkknight109 posted... BlackScythe0 posted... JixHedgehog posted... As of right now, no Until someone can come up with some credible evidence that he broke a law he's fine Obstruction of justice. Based on what's on the table right now, an Obstruction cause likely would not stick. There's some circumstantial evidence, and a whole lot of hearsay floating around, but the concrete evidence is still pretty thin. Be patient and let investigators do their work. He literally admitted to obstruction of justice in a televised interview. --- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mead "I'm Mary Poppins ya'll!" <cite>Mead posted [p:879737837] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JixHedgehog posted...</cite> <quote>As of right now, no Until someone can come up with some credible evidence that he broke a law he's fine</quote> Obstruction of justice.</quote> Based on what's on the table right now, an Obstruction cause likely would not stick. There's some circumstantial evidence, and a whole lot of hearsay floating around, but the concrete evidence is still pretty thin. Be patient and let investigators do their work.</quote> He literally admitted to obstruction of justice in a televised interview.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 05/24/17 5:07:11 PM #18:	Yes, he should bc liberals should get what they want <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:879737884] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>Yes, he should bc liberals should get what they want</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Person106 05/24/17 5:13:16 PM #19:	OhhhJa posted... Yes, he should bc liberals should get what they want Seems to me they want Mike Pence for president. Who'd have thunk. --- https://supermariomakerbookmark.nintendo.net/profile/person106 <cite>Person106 posted [p:879738262] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>Yes, he should bc liberals should get what they want</quote> Seems to me they want Mike Pence for president. Who'd have thunk.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lightning Bolt 05/24/17 5:15:20 PM #20:	Person106 posted... OhhhJa posted... Yes, he should bc liberals should get what they want Seems to me they want Mike Pence for president. Who'd have thunk. Not ideal, but that'd probably be okay. I'm fine with the president disagreeing with me. I'm not fine with the president actually being incompetent. --- One day dude, I'm just gonna get off the bus, and I'm gonna run in the woods and never come back, and when I come back I'm gonna be the knife master! -The Rev <cite>Lightning Bolt posted [p:879738387] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>Person106 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>Yes, he should bc liberals should get what they want</quote> Seems to me they want Mike Pence for president. Who'd have thunk.</quote> Not ideal, but that'd probably be okay. I'm fine with the president disagreeing with me. I'm not fine with the president actually being incompetent.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MrZAP17 05/24/17 5:26:31 PM #21:	Lightning Bolt posted... Person106 posted... OhhhJa posted... Yes, he should bc liberals should get what they want Seems to me they want Mike Pence for president. Who'd have thunk. Not ideal, but that'd probably be okay. I'm fine with the president disagreeing with me. I'm not fine with the president actually being incompetent. Some would link the two. Not saying that there aren't also people who agree with me that are incompetent, but I would argue that those who do not want what I want are incompetent at getting what I want. Or in other words their disagreement with me is in itself disqualifying. --- "The truth is rarely pure and never simple." <cite>MrZAP17 posted [p:879739039] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>Lightning Bolt posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Person106 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>Yes, he should bc liberals should get what they want</quote> Seems to me they want Mike Pence for president. Who'd have thunk.</quote> Not ideal, but that'd probably be okay. I'm fine with the president disagreeing with me. I'm not fine with the president actually being incompetent.</quote> Some would link the two. Not saying that there aren't also people who agree with me that are incompetent, but I would argue that those who do not want what I want are incompetent at getting what I want. Or in other words their disagreement with me is in itself disqualifying.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Erik_P 05/24/17 5:27:18 PM #22:	darkknight109 posted... BlackScythe0 posted... JixHedgehog posted... As of right now, no Until someone can come up with some credible evidence that he broke a law he's fine Obstruction of justice. Based on what's on the table right now, an Obstruction cause likely would not stick. There's some circumstantial evidence, and a whole lot of hearsay floating around, but the concrete evidence is still pretty thin. Be patient and let investigators do their work. He literally admitted to it in an interview. --- #welchingalldayerrday <cite>Erik_P posted [p:879739080] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JixHedgehog posted...</cite> <quote>As of right now, no Until someone can come up with some credible evidence that he broke a law he's fine</quote> Obstruction of justice.</quote> Based on what's on the table right now, an Obstruction cause likely would not stick. There's some circumstantial evidence, and a whole lot of hearsay floating around, but the concrete evidence is still pretty thin. Be patient and let investigators do their work.</quote> He literally admitted to it in an interview.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
streamofthesky 05/24/17 6:01:54 PM #23:	Not until and if Democrats retake the House in 2018 and Pence is also impeached. After that, yes. If either of those does not happen, NO. We'd end up w/ an even worse president, I'd rather tolerate a literal traitor to America that can't get anything done at that point. Bringing justice and doing the right thing are such lofty and noble aspirations, but if you have any sense of pragmatism, it's not worth destroying our country just to do the right thing. And that's what a President Pence or Ryan would mean. <cite>streamofthesky posted [p:879741138] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>Not until and if Democrats retake the House in 2018 and Pence is also impeached. After that, yes. If either of those does not happen, NO. We'd end up w/ an even worse president, I'd rather tolerate a literal traitor to America that can't get anything done at that point. Bringing justice and doing the right thing are such lofty and noble aspirations, but if you have any sense of pragmatism, it's not worth destroying our country just to do the right thing. And that's what a President Pence or Ryan would mean.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 05/24/17 6:08:18 PM #24:	Erik_P posted... darkknight109 posted... BlackScythe0 posted... JixHedgehog posted... As of right now, no Until someone can come up with some credible evidence that he broke a law he's fine Obstruction of justice. Based on what's on the table right now, an Obstruction cause likely would not stick. There's some circumstantial evidence, and a whole lot of hearsay floating around, but the concrete evidence is still pretty thin. Be patient and let investigators do their work. He literally admitted to it in an interview. Not good enough. If all you have to go on is his word in one interview, it will never stand up in court. All he would have to say is, "I was lying/exaggerating; the real reason I fired him is the one I laid out in the formal, signed letter of termination that was delivered to his office, not the off-the-cuff remark made in the middle of an interview." Again, be patient. Trump usually provides ample rope with which to hang himself and the people running the intelligence agencies aren't stupid; if there's something here to find, it will be found. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:879741520] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>Erik_P posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JixHedgehog posted...</cite> <quote>As of right now, no Until someone can come up with some credible evidence that he broke a law he's fine</quote> Obstruction of justice.</quote> Based on what's on the table right now, an Obstruction cause likely would not stick. There's some circumstantial evidence, and a whole lot of hearsay floating around, but the concrete evidence is still pretty thin. Be patient and let investigators do their work.</quote> He literally admitted to it in an interview.</quote> Not good enough. If all you have to go on is his word in one interview, it will never stand up in court. All he would have to say is, "I was lying/exaggerating; the real reason I fired him is the one I laid out in the formal, signed letter of termination that was delivered to his office, not the off-the-cuff remark made in the middle of an interview." Again, be patient. Trump usually provides ample rope with which to hang himself and the people running the intelligence agencies aren't stupid; if there's something here to find, it will be found.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 05/24/17 6:10:55 PM #25:	He'd have had to have done something first. Right now, no evidence has been turned up. jamieyello3 posted... Yes I'm gonna be honest, the Comey Russia scandel is a much bigger deal than gay Muslim Obama being born in Kenya during a Satanist ritual, and frankly I'll take Pence, he's probably much more intelligent. Trump might the dumbest president we've ever had. Pretty sure he was a plant by the Clintons that went catastrophically wrong. He's like Wheatley from Portal 2. Trump outright came out and stated he fired Comey for looking into him when his administration was pushing another story that was supposed to be a cover-up. Not that it will happen with the Republican senate. Pretty much why I wonder if Yellow is an actual person. BlackScythe0 posted... Yes, I expect impeachment will begin by the end of the year. Probably mean more if you hadn't been saying impeachment before he even took office. darkknight109 posted... Thus far it hasn't been proven that he's done anything illegal - I'm content to wait until the various probes and investigations finish and report their findings before I make the call on whether impeachment is worthwhile. This, pretty much. I doubt there's anything to it since Occam's Razor suggests there's no collusion because none would be necessary. darkknight109 posted... Honestly, though, I'm conflicted. On the one hand, Trump is bad for the country - and bad for the world - which makes me root for impeachment; on the other hand, his potential replacements in Pence and Ryan (if Pence winds up impeached too) I suspect would be far more damaging in the long run, which makes me root for Trump to stay in office as the buffoonish fop who can't get anything done. Honestly, he's no worse than anybody else and the hyperbolic claims about that are silly. The vocal allegations against him involve Trump rolling back shit that shouldn't have been done in the first place. While we can't bring back everybody killed by the Obama administrations's illegal war in the Middle East (whose victims included an entire fucking wedding procession), I'm happy to see as much else undone as possible. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash <cite>Zeus posted [p:879741685] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>He'd have had to have done something first. Right now, no evidence has been turned up. <cite>jamieyello3 posted...</cite> <quote>Yes I'm gonna be honest, the Comey Russia scandel is a much bigger deal than gay Muslim Obama being born in Kenya during a Satanist ritual, and frankly I'll take Pence, he's probably much more intelligent. Trump might the dumbest president we've ever had. Pretty sure he was a plant by the Clintons that went catastrophically wrong. He's like Wheatley from Portal 2. Trump outright came out and stated he fired Comey for looking into him when his administration was pushing another story that was supposed to be a cover-up. Not that it will happen with the Republican senate.</quote> Pretty much why I wonder if Yellow is an actual person. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>Yes, I expect impeachment will begin by the end of the year.</quote> Probably mean more if you hadn't been saying impeachment before he even took office. <cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote>Thus far it hasn't been proven that he's done anything illegal - I'm content to wait until the various probes and investigations finish and report their findings before I make the call on whether impeachment is worthwhile.</quote> This, pretty much. I doubt there's anything to it since Occam's Razor suggests there's no collusion because none would be necessary. <cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote>Honestly, though, I'm conflicted. On the one hand, Trump is bad for the country - and bad for the world - which makes me root for impeachment; on the other hand, his potential replacements in Pence and Ryan (if Pence winds up impeached too) I suspect would be far more damaging in the long run, which makes me root for Trump to stay in office as the buffoonish fop who can't get anything done.</quote> Honestly, he's no worse than anybody else and the hyperbolic claims about that are silly. The vocal allegations against him involve Trump rolling back shit that shouldn't have been done in the first place. While we can't bring back everybody killed by the Obama administrations's illegal war in the Middle East (whose victims included an entire fucking wedding procession), I'm happy to see as much else undone as possible.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
jamieyello3 05/24/17 6:14:55 PM #27:	Zues shut the hell up about me being a troll. You're the only one who thinks that because I'm one of the few posters who even bothers responding to you anymore. You call me a troll because that's easier than defending Trump against his own words. <cite>jamieyello3 posted [p:879741929] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>Zues shut the hell up about me being a troll. You're the only one who thinks that because I'm one of the few posters who even bothers responding to you anymore. You call me a troll because that's easier than defending Trump against his own words.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
James xeno 05/24/17 6:31:38 PM #28:	Yo.... or maybe nes.. i'm not sure yet. J_Dawg983 posted... Yes, he doesn't even care about feelings. WHAT!?! He doesn't?? Why haven't we risen up against his intolerable tyranny of indifference over a very specific and select few's feelings! The goddamn monster! Oh wait..... --- http://imgur.com/a/s2O4b Koto and Juri and Ruka oh my! <cite>James xeno posted [p:879742886] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>Yo.... or maybe nes.. i'm not sure yet. <cite>J_Dawg983 posted...</cite> <quote>Yes, he doesn't even care about feelings.</quote> WHAT!?! He doesn't?? Why haven't we risen up against his intolerable tyranny of indifference over a very specific and select few's feelings! The goddamn monster! Oh wait.....</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 05/24/17 6:33:05 PM #29:	James xeno posted... Yo.... or maybe nes.. i'm not sure yet. J_Dawg983 posted... Yes, he doesn't even care about feelings. WHAT!?! He doesn't?? Why haven't we risen up against his intolerable tyranny of indifference over a very specific and select few's feelings! The goddamn monster! Oh wait..... Lol i figured he was joking but knowing potd probably not <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:879742986] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>James xeno posted...</cite> <quote>Yo.... or maybe nes.. i'm not sure yet. <cite>J_Dawg983 posted...</cite> <quote>Yes, he doesn't even care about feelings.</quote> WHAT!?! He doesn't?? Why haven't we risen up against his intolerable tyranny of indifference over a very specific and select few's feelings! The goddamn monster! Oh wait.....</quote> Lol i figured he was joking but knowing potd probably not</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
James xeno 05/24/17 6:39:49 PM #30:	OhhhJa posted... James xeno posted... Yo.... or maybe nes.. i'm not sure yet. J_Dawg983 posted... Yes, he doesn't even care about feelings. WHAT!?! He doesn't?? Why haven't we risen up against his intolerable tyranny of indifference over a very specific and select few's feelings! The goddamn monster! Oh wait..... Lol i figured he was joking but knowing potd probably not It kind of works either way so... lol --- http://imgur.com/a/s2O4b Koto and Juri and Ruka oh my! <cite>James xeno posted [p:879743367] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote><cite>James xeno posted...</cite> <quote>Yo.... or maybe nes.. i'm not sure yet. <cite>J_Dawg983 posted...</cite> <quote>Yes, he doesn't even care about feelings.</quote> WHAT!?! He doesn't?? Why haven't we risen up against his intolerable tyranny of indifference over a very specific and select few's feelings! The goddamn monster! Oh wait.....</quote> Lol i figured he was joking but knowing potd probably not</quote> It kind of works either way so... lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 05/24/17 6:42:22 PM #31:	Zeus posted... Honestly, he's no worse than anybody else and the hyperbolic claims about that are silly. Agreed. I mean, aside from the multitude of ways he is demonstrably worse and in way over his head, he`s totally the greatest. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:879743510] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Honestly, he's no worse than anybody else and the hyperbolic claims about that are silly.</quote> Agreed. I mean, aside from the multitude of ways he is demonstrably worse and in way over his head, he`s totally the greatest.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
zebatov 05/24/17 6:44:37 PM #32:	Reading through this thread made me some kinda thirsty. #imparched <cite>zebatov posted [p:879743654] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>Reading through this thread made me some kinda thirsty. #imparched</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DirtBasedSoap 05/24/17 6:45:31 PM #33:	slacker03150 posted... Even if there is nothing to the Russia scandal, the evidence shows that he has tried to intimidate witnesses, silence journalists, and stop an investigation against him, so even if we end up with mike pence, I think impeachment would be fair at this point. So if it turns out he's innocent he should still be impeached? lolwut --- http://i.imgur.com/anU2AWL.png <cite>DirtBasedSoap posted [p:879743709] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>slacker03150 posted...</cite> <quote>Even if there is nothing to the Russia scandal, the evidence shows that he has tried to intimidate witnesses, silence journalists, and stop an investigation against him, so even if we end up with mike pence, I think impeachment would be fair at this point.</quote> So if it turns out he's innocent he should still be impeached? lolwut</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 05/24/17 6:48:13 PM #34:	DirtBasedSoap posted... slacker03150 posted... Even if there is nothing to the Russia scandal, the evidence shows that he has tried to intimidate witnesses, silence journalists, and stop an investigation against him, so even if we end up with mike pence, I think impeachment would be fair at this point. So if it turns out he's innocent he should still be impeached? lolwut He would still be guilty of Obstruction of Justice. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:879743873] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>DirtBasedSoap posted...</cite> <quote><cite>slacker03150 posted...</cite> <quote>Even if there is nothing to the Russia scandal, the evidence shows that he has tried to intimidate witnesses, silence journalists, and stop an investigation against him, so even if we end up with mike pence, I think impeachment would be fair at this point.</quote> So if it turns out he's innocent he should still be impeached? lolwut</quote> He would still be guilty of Obstruction of Justice.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheCyborgNinja 05/24/17 6:52:27 PM #35:	I think North America needs to redraw its borders. Just because something is or was a country doesn't mean it always has to be. Look at Yugoslavia. Great idea at the time, but eventually it just stopped working for everyone. Canada and the United States should just be carved up into a dozen new countries, averaging out various values and geographical factors. --- "message parlor" ? do you mean the post office ? - SlayerX888 <cite>TheCyborgNinja posted [p:879744121] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>I think North America needs to redraw its borders. Just because something is or was a country doesn't mean it always has to be. Look at Yugoslavia. Great idea at the time, but eventually it just stopped working for everyone. Canada and the United States should just be carved up into a dozen new countries, averaging out various values and geographical factors.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269 05/24/17 7:09:04 PM #36:	DirtBasedSoap posted... slacker03150 posted... Even if there is nothing to the Russia scandal, the evidence shows that he has tried to intimidate witnesses, silence journalists, and stop an investigation against him, so even if we end up with mike pence, I think impeachment would be fair at this point. So if it turns out he's innocent he should still be impeached? lolwut Being innocent of murder wouldn't inherently make you innocent of battery, so why would it be different here? --- RIP_Supa posted... I've seen some stuff <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:879745041] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>DirtBasedSoap posted...</cite> <quote><cite>slacker03150 posted...</cite> <quote>Even if there is nothing to the Russia scandal, the evidence shows that he has tried to intimidate witnesses, silence journalists, and stop an investigation against him, so even if we end up with mike pence, I think impeachment would be fair at this point.</quote> So if it turns out he's innocent he should still be impeached? lolwut</quote> Being innocent of murder wouldn't inherently make you innocent of battery, so why would it be different here?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Conner4REAL 05/24/17 7:09:05 PM #37:	slacker03150 posted... Even if there is nothing to the Russia scandal, the evidence shows that he has tried to intimidate witnesses, silence journalists, and stop an investigation against him, so even if we end up with mike pence, I think impeachment would be fair at this point. That's similar to Nixon and watergate. It's unlikely Nixon had any knowledge of the break in prior to it, but rather than toss the actual people of his administration who were involved to be brought to justice he and the White House actively covered up and resisted attempts to investigate. Even if trump had nothing to do with this or its frivolous the conduct after the fact is a disgrace that makes it a bigger issue. Is it likely that Nixon and trump were directly inclvolved in something? Possibly- I would say the likely hood of trump more than Nixon because as much as a crook as Nixon was, he knew the political system and how to play the game. At that point trump seems like he micromanaged everything. Which would be expected coming from someone who has always kept a tight hold on his business activities. --- "Now I'm in THREE cowboy hats!!!" ~ Senator Bluto Blutarsky <cite>Conner4REAL posted [p:879745043] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>slacker03150 posted...</cite> <quote>Even if there is nothing to the Russia scandal, the evidence shows that he has tried to intimidate witnesses, silence journalists, and stop an investigation against him, so even if we end up with mike pence, I think impeachment would be fair at this point.</quote> That's similar to Nixon and watergate. It's unlikely Nixon had any knowledge of the break in prior to it, but rather than toss the actual people of his administration who were involved to be brought to justice he and the White House actively covered up and resisted attempts to investigate. Even if trump had nothing to do with this or its frivolous the conduct after the fact is a disgrace that makes it a bigger issue. Is it likely that Nixon and trump were directly inclvolved in something? Possibly- I would say the likely hood of trump more than Nixon because as much as a crook as Nixon was, he knew the political system and how to play the game. At that point trump seems like he micromanaged everything. Which would be expected coming from someone who has always kept a tight hold on his business activities.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Conner4REAL 05/24/17 7:13:10 PM #38:	Kyuubi4269 posted... DirtBasedSoap posted... slacker03150 posted... Even if there is nothing to the Russia scandal, the evidence shows that he has tried to intimidate witnesses, silence journalists, and stop an investigation against him, so even if we end up with mike pence, I think impeachment would be fair at this point. So if it turns out he's innocent he should still be impeached? lolwut Being innocent of murder wouldn't inherently make you innocent of battery, so why would it be different here? You do realize that witness intimidation, hindering an investigation destroying evidence and any other list of crimes are actual crimes regardless of the underlying investigation right? Like the dude who responded to you said- being innocent of murder doesn't make you innocent of battery. But I'll do one more- if you hinder a police investigation and intimidate witnesses (a very serious charge) and destroy potential evidence you can still be charged with that even if it turns out there is zero chance you commuted the underlying murder? Even if the supposed murder victim Trina up alive you can and probably will be charged with the other serious offenses. --- "Now I'm in THREE cowboy hats!!!" ~ Senator Bluto Blutarsky <cite>Conner4REAL posted [p:879745283] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DirtBasedSoap posted...</cite> <quote><cite>slacker03150 posted...</cite> <quote>Even if there is nothing to the Russia scandal, the evidence shows that he has tried to intimidate witnesses, silence journalists, and stop an investigation against him, so even if we end up with mike pence, I think impeachment would be fair at this point.</quote> So if it turns out he's innocent he should still be impeached? lolwut</quote> Being innocent of murder wouldn't inherently make you innocent of battery, so why would it be different here?</quote> You do realize that witness intimidation, hindering an investigation destroying evidence and any other list of crimes are actual crimes regardless of the underlying investigation right? Like the dude who responded to you said- being innocent of murder doesn't make you innocent of battery. But I'll do one more- if you hinder a police investigation and intimidate witnesses (a very serious charge) and destroy potential evidence you can still be charged with that even if it turns out there is zero chance you commuted the underlying murder? Even if the supposed murder victim Trina up alive you can and probably will be charged with the other serious offenses.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JixHedgehog 05/25/17 2:08:11 AM #39:	darkknight109 posted... BlackScythe0 posted... JixHedgehog posted... As of right now, no Until someone can come up with some credible evidence that he broke a law he's fine Obstruction of justice. Based on what's on the table right now, an Obstruction cause likely would not stick. There's some circumstantial evidence, and a whole lot of hearsay floating around, but the concrete evidence is still pretty thin. Be patient and let investigators do their work. Yep, if there's something solid out there, they'll find it --- Not changing my sig until Nintendo announces the Switch XL 1/12/2017 <cite>JixHedgehog posted [p:879766678] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JixHedgehog posted...</cite> <quote>As of right now, no Until someone can come up with some credible evidence that he broke a law he's fine</quote> Obstruction of justice.</quote> Based on what's on the table right now, an Obstruction cause likely would not stick. There's some circumstantial evidence, and a whole lot of hearsay floating around, but the concrete evidence is still pretty thin. Be patient and let investigators do their work.</quote> Yep, if there's something solid out there, they'll find it</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PimpMyRhydon 05/25/17 3:09:09 AM #40:	It'd be pretty hilarious if he was. --- EMBLEM STEEEEEEEAL!!! <cite>PimpMyRhydon posted [p:879768478] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>It'd be pretty hilarious if he was.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sensual_T_Rex 05/25/17 4:00:43 AM #41:	To all the people who are demonizing and belittling the president I have 1 question for you. What do you think his final boss form will be? --- Babylon ah mosh up the sea and fear him da Rasta mon. <cite>Sensual_T_Rex posted [p:879769719] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>To all the people who are demonizing and belittling the president I have 1 question for you. What do you think his final boss form will be?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
slacker03150 05/25/17 4:42:51 AM #42:	Sensual_T_Rex posted... To all the people who are demonizing and belittling the president I have 1 question for you. What do you think his final boss form will be? Whoever is president next pardons them and he goes around doing rallies talking about how it was all a leftist conspiracy. --- I am awesome and so are you. Lenny gone but not forgotten. - 12/10/2015 <cite>slacker03150 posted [p:879770490] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sensual_T_Rex posted...</cite> <quote>To all the people who are demonizing and belittling the president I have 1 question for you. What do you think his final boss form will be?</quote> Whoever is president next pardons them and he goes around doing rallies talking about how it was all a leftist conspiracy.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Giant2005 05/25/17 4:52:15 AM #43:	No. Even if it turned out that all of the rumors about Trump were true (which they almost certainly aren't), none of them are actually crimes - without a crime there can be no impeachment. <cite>Giant2005 posted [p:879770654] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>No. Even if it turned out that all of the rumors about Trump were true (which they almost certainly aren't), none of them are actually crimes - without a crime there can be no impeachment.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269 05/25/17 5:30:23 AM #44:	Giant2005 posted... No. Even if it turned out that all of the rumors about Trump were true (which they almost certainly aren't), none of them are actually crimes - without a crime there can be no impeachment. Ya, the FBI investigate petty rumors and silly tittle-tattle all the time, that's like their job. Sensual_T_Rex posted... To all the people who are demonizing and belittling the president I have 1 question for you. What do you think his final boss form will be? Orange turns red, arms flail, finishing move is being dragged off stage by men in white coats. --- RIP_Supa posted... I've seen some stuff <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:879771245] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>Giant2005 posted...</cite> <quote>No. Even if it turned out that all of the rumors about Trump were true (which they almost certainly aren't), none of them are actually crimes - without a crime there can be no impeachment.</quote> Ya, the FBI investigate petty rumors and silly tittle-tattle all the time, that's like their job. <cite>Sensual_T_Rex posted...</cite> <quote>To all the people who are demonizing and belittling the president I have 1 question for you. What do you think his final boss form will be?</quote> Orange turns red, arms flail, finishing move is being dragged off stage by men in white coats.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 05/25/17 5:44:32 AM #45:	Giant2005 posted... No. Even if it turned out that all of the rumors about Trump were true (which they almost certainly aren't), none of them are actually crimes - without a crime there can be no impeachment. That actually isn't true. A president can be removed from office without committing any crime through impeachment. --- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mead "I'm Mary Poppins ya'll!" <cite>Mead posted [p:879771495] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>Giant2005 posted...</cite> <quote>No. Even if it turned out that all of the rumors about Trump were true (which they almost certainly aren't), none of them are actually crimes - without a crime there can be no impeachment.</quote> That actually isn't true. A president can be removed from office without committing any crime through impeachment.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheCyborgNinja 05/25/17 6:25:19 AM #46:	Mead posted... Giant2005 posted... No. Even if it turned out that all of the rumors about Trump were true (which they almost certainly aren't), none of them are actually crimes - without a crime there can be no impeachment. That actually isn't true. A president can be removed from office without committing any crime through impeachment. This. They can basically say "fuck it, he sucks" and off he goes... --- "message parlor" ? do you mean the post office ? - SlayerX888 <cite>TheCyborgNinja posted [p:879772193] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Giant2005 posted...</cite> <quote>No. Even if it turned out that all of the rumors about Trump were true (which they almost certainly aren't), none of them are actually crimes - without a crime there can be no impeachment.</quote> That actually isn't true. A president can be removed from office without committing any crime through impeachment.</quote> This. They can basically say "fuck it, he sucks" and off he goes...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HornedLion 05/25/17 6:29:01 AM #47:	Lol. Everyone is stuck on the Russian thing. Don't get me wrong... I believe it holds water. And the obstruction charge is real and it all depends on who can debate it better. BUT... The real impeachable offense was 2 weeks ago and had nothing to do with obstruction, Comey, FBI, Russia, Tweets, none of that. It had to do when he ordered that attack. President CANNOT just attack countries WITHOUT the consent of Congress unless we have been attacked first. We're in peace time. Now, we can argue that the republicans would've probably made it pass anyway but... that's not how it works. I can't assume that my swinger friend is probably gonna be fine with me banging his wife and do it before I ask him. --- "Wrong again, clown. I was warned for marking too many posts for trolling." - RonBurgundy929 <cite>HornedLion posted [p:879772247] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>Lol. Everyone is stuck on the Russian thing. Don't get me wrong... I believe it holds water. And the obstruction charge is real and it all depends on who can debate it better. BUT... The real impeachable offense was 2 weeks ago and had nothing to do with obstruction, Comey, FBI, Russia, Tweets, none of that. It had to do when he ordered that attack. President CANNOT just attack countries WITHOUT the consent of Congress unless we have been attacked first. We're in peace time. Now, we can argue that the republicans would've probably made it pass anyway but... that's not how it works. I can't assume that my swinger friend is probably gonna be fine with me banging his wife and do it before I ask him.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MrZAP17 05/25/17 7:20:02 AM #48:	HornedLion posted... Lol. Everyone is stuck on the Russian thing. Don't get me wrong... I believe it holds water. And the obstruction charge is real and it all depends on who can debate it better. BUT... The real impeachable offense was 2 weeks ago and had nothing to do with obstruction, Comey, FBI, Russia, Tweets, none of that. It had to do when he ordered that attack. President CANNOT just attack countries WITHOUT the consent of Congress unless we have been attacked first. We're in peace time. Now, we can argue that the republicans would've probably made it pass anyway but... that's not how it works. I can't assume that my swinger friend is probably gonna be fine with me banging his wife and do it before I ask him. This is also a good point. So now we have 1. Emoluments violations 2. Illegal strike against a sovereign nation 3. Obstruction of justice Also not impeachable under the circumstances, but he should probably be tried for sexual assault. What else? --- "The truth is rarely pure and never simple." <cite>MrZAP17 posted [p:879773215] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>HornedLion posted...</cite> <quote>Lol. Everyone is stuck on the Russian thing. Don't get me wrong... I believe it holds water. And the obstruction charge is real and it all depends on who can debate it better. BUT... The real impeachable offense was 2 weeks ago and had nothing to do with obstruction, Comey, FBI, Russia, Tweets, none of that. It had to do when he ordered that attack. President CANNOT just attack countries WITHOUT the consent of Congress unless we have been attacked first. We're in peace time. Now, we can argue that the republicans would've probably made it pass anyway but... that's not how it works. I can't assume that my swinger friend is probably gonna be fine with me banging his wife and do it before I ask him.</quote> This is also a good point. So now we have 1. Emoluments violations 2. Illegal strike against a sovereign nation 3. Obstruction of justice Also not impeachable under the circumstances, but he should probably be tried for sexual assault. What else?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Giant2005 05/25/17 8:01:14 AM #49:	Kyuubi4269 posted... Giant2005 posted... No. Even if it turned out that all of the rumors about Trump were true (which they almost certainly aren't), none of them are actually crimes - without a crime there can be no impeachment. Ya, the FBI investigate petty rumors and silly tittle-tattle all the time, that's like their job. It sounds like you are being sarcastic, but the sarcasm really is unnecessary considering your description of their actual job was flawless. <cite>Giant2005 posted [p:879774194] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Giant2005 posted...</cite> <quote>No. Even if it turned out that all of the rumors about Trump were true (which they almost certainly aren't), none of them are actually crimes - without a crime there can be no impeachment.</quote> Ya, the FBI investigate petty rumors and silly tittle-tattle all the time, that's like their job.</quote> It sounds like you are being sarcastic, but the sarcasm really is unnecessary considering your description of their actual job was flawless.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gguirao 05/25/17 1:30:14 PM #50:	Yes, unfortunately, that will leave us with President Pence. --- Donald J. Trump--proof against government intelligence. <cite>gguirao posted [p:879789251] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>Yes, unfortunately, that will leave us with President Pence.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 05/25/17 5:42:41 PM #51:	gguirao posted... Yes, unfortunately, that will leave us with President Pence. Depending on how things go he might get the boot too which would leave us with Ryan which is even more terrifying. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:879804019] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>gguirao posted...</cite> <quote>Yes, unfortunately, that will leave us with President Pence.</quote> Depending on how things go he might get the boot too which would leave us with Ryan which is even more terrifying.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Poll of the Day > Should Trump be impeached? (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > Should Trump be impeached?