Are you ruling it out? Just like that? Oh, how media conditions the human mind to roll with popular opinion. Guessing you haven't read up on it either. Of course it's an unpopular opinion. Who the hell wants to believe in something that ridiculous, right?
The difference between a conspiracy theorist and disbelievers/amateur conspiracy theorists is this:
Answers are gauged by "likely/unlikely" versus "true/false."
I already ruled it out years ago. The best people can come up with is the meme that is always posted. "Jet fuel can't melt steel beams". There's no actual science behind the claims. Just people trying to monetize gullible people like yourself on YouTube. Like the flat earth theorists too.
Wasn't it also all of the ink toner and various other burnables in the offices that fueled the flame even more? Besides the entire tower was designed to collapse like that if it was in danger. It was designed to reduce collateral damage and keep from falling on other buildings. The only conspiracy with 9/11 is that the U.S. knew about it and did nothing. Just like pearl harbor. The Pentagon may have been attacked by missiles and covered up so they wouldn't look vulnerable. But I do not believe it was a government orchestrated event.
Wasn't the Pearl Harbor one confirmed? Not as them actually letting it happen but them knowing it would be a huge target and didn't do much about defending it.
Isn't that the same thing? They needed to be attacked in order to get unanimous public support. Which 9/11 basically was. Only difference is the war that followed. One was just and one was greed. I can understand the sacrifice for a just war, but for pure greed and profit I don't. ---