LogFAQs > #904437022

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	This 22 y/o Kid is SUING a GIRL for 6 MILLION because she DESTROYED his life!!!
Garlands_Soul 07/03/18 5:30:21 PM #19:	Golden Road posted... The_tall_midget posted... Yeah... No. Before making a life-destroying accusation such as an accusation of rape (especially considering the kind of reactions from all the simps and white knights on social media), you better fucking have evidence. She didn't prove shit and thus he's not guilty of anything. That girl deserves to have her life destroyed. Such she's another entitled attention whore who didn't get her way and is now being petty about it. So it only works one way? If she needs Absolute Proof in order to call him a rapist, why doesn't he need Absolute Proof in order to call her a liar? Lol what proof do you need besides the absence of proof? That's how investigations work. If Jimmy supposedly killed Mark but literally nothing shows he did, then Jimmy is innocent. The absence of proof is proof. Until they find literally anything to show he's the culprit, he is only accused. One person's word versus another's when everything so far shows that their word is bullshit is grounds for acquittal. --- "I, Garland, will knock you all down!" <cite>Garlands_Soul posted [p:904437022] in This 22 y/... [t:76771427]...</cite> <quote><cite>Golden Road posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The_tall_midget posted...</cite> <quote>Yeah... No. Before making a life-destroying accusation such as an accusation of rape (especially considering the kind of reactions from all the simps and white knights on social media), you better fucking have evidence. She didn't prove shit and thus he's not guilty of anything. That girl deserves to have her life destroyed. Such she's another entitled attention whore who didn't get her way and is now being petty about it.</quote> So it only works one way? If she needs Absolute Proof in order to call him a rapist, why doesn't he need Absolute Proof in order to call her a liar?</quote> Lol what proof do you need besides the absence of proof? That's how investigations work. If Jimmy supposedly killed Mark but literally nothing shows he did, then Jimmy is innocent. The absence of proof is proof. Until they find literally anything to show he's the culprit, he is only accused. One person's word versus another's when everything so far shows that their word is bullshit is grounds for acquittal. --- "I, Garland, will knock you all down!"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1