Poll of the Day > This 22 y/o Kid is SUING a GIRL for 6 MILLION because she DESTROYED his life!!!

(+) Yeah! (+)

22 y/o Catherine Reddington has repeatedly accused 22 y/o Alex Goldman, a former Frat Brother in New York's Syracuse University of RAPE and he's now SUING her for 6 MILLION smackers because her "unsubstantiated" claims that he raped her after a drunken frat party has DESTROYED his life!!

Catherine said the rape happened last year at a frat party at Delta Kappa Epsilon Fraternity and informed police and the university of the rape after that happened and took to social media several times to reveal the details of the assault as part of the #MeToo movement.

Alex was given the boot after the claims surfaced and was FIRED from his summer internship with an engineering firm after his accuser informed them of what he did..but he was never arrested for charged over it

She wrote "During the early hours of April 23, 2017, i was raped and sodomized. I woke up in Delta Kappa Epsilon Fraternity in Alex Goldman's bed confused, bloody, bruised, with ripped clothing and splinter. Alex Goldman is a rapist"

Police investigated but found no evidence that she was raped or even had a sexual encounter with him.

A medical exam and rape kit within 25 hours of the incident found that she had no internal cuts or abrasions in her vagina and that there's no traces of his DNA

Both said they had no memory of the night before and now he's filing a defamation suit against her as he said she's waging a campaign to "destroy and wreak havoc" on his life after getting him expelled

The lawsuit states in the last few weeks, she has made numerous posts on social media on FB and Linkedln falsely accusing him of sexual assault and that he's a "rapist". It also said she used his picture and tagged him to his employer and the university where he attends as they contend it's false and intentionally made..

She left a review on NJIT's FB page that says "A school that accepts recently expelled rapists, despite it being marked on their transcript"

She contacted his employer, Bohler Engineering and posted an exchange between her and the employer that he was fired.

He's asking for 6 million in damages for defamation claiming emotional, mental and economic harm

Do you think this kid is "innocent" because he wasn't charged?

Catherine -

http://tinyurl.com/y74ceugw

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/07/01/13/4DCFD8CC00000578-5906109-image-m-18_1530449154624.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/07/01/13/4DCFD8C800000578-5906109-image-a-19_1530449164948.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/07/01/13/4DCFD8D400000578-5906109-image-a-20_1530449176832.jpg

Alex -

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/07/01/13/4DCFD98500000578-5906109-image-a-16_1530449122727.jpg
---

If they didn't find any evidence, wouldn't he be innocent? Is there something I'm missing?
---

Full Throttle posted...

She wrote "During the early hours of April 23, 2017, i was raped and sodomized. I woke up in Delta Kappa Epsilon Fraternity in Alex Goldman's bed confused, bloody, bruised, with ripped clothing and splinter. Alex Goldman is a rapist"

Police investigated but found no evidence that she was raped or even had a sexual encounter with him.

A medical exam and rape kit within 25 hours of the incident found that she had no internal cuts or abrasions in her vagina and that there's no traces of his DNA

You see, highly emotional feminists and white knight SJWs will read stories like this.....and immediately assume the man is guilty. They will rally behind the girl without thinking twice about it. Because to do anything else...would be "insensitive".

However, me, being a rational human being.....focus entirely on the MOST IMPORTANT details within the article. Such as:

She wrote "During the early hours of April 23, 2017, i was raped and sodomized. I woke up in Delta Kappa Epsilon Fraternity in Alex Goldman's bed confused, bloody, bruised, with ripped clothing and splinter. Alex Goldman is a rapist"

Okay. She woke up in his bed bloody and bruised. Those are pretty big claims. Also vague as hell. Bloody where? Her vagina? Her anus? Her face? Bruised where? How badly? Like evidence that someone hit her intentionally? Or bruised on her knees, shin, or hip from stumbling up the stairs when she was drunk? These details are crucial.

Also, it's 2018. Kids take pictures of EVERYTHING. A young woman who thinks she was assaulted....the FIRST thing she would do is go in the bathroom and start taking pictures of the damage. Being a victim is the coolest, hippest thing a person can be. It gives you the power to sue, endless supplies of sympathy, and she could probably even start a GoFunMe on social media. Did she take pictures of her injuries? If not, why not?

Police investigated but found no evidence that she was raped or even had a sexual encounter with him.

A medical exam and rape kit within 25 hours of the incident found that she had no internal cuts or abrasions in her vagina and that there's no traces of his DNA

I mean, can there still be any doubt after this?

It sounds like she was just a drunk idiot that night and felt like ruining a guy's life because he friend-zoned her or something.

I really hate what the #MeToo is doing to a lot of young men. Guilty until proven innocent. And all these virtue-signalling companies firing men for no reason simply because of ALLEGATIONS and their "zero tolerance" policy.

It's shameful.
---

She claimed she was bloodied and bruised yet there was no mention of it by the police, or in the ME report? Surely if she was injured in any way, one, or both reports would indicate as such?

Both claimed they have no memory of the night before? If that's the case how does she know she was raped by him? (Or anyone else for that matter)

Without being there first hand to see what happened, and only going by what's written it does come across as if she's crying wolf, and/or has a personal vendetta against him.

If he's truly innocent she deserves to be punished for what she's done, not only has she ruined his life, she's also spat in the faces of actual rape victims that don't get taken seriously thanks to people that cry wolf as a form of revenge.

If he's guilty, then he's got what's coming to him, and chances are since the public court of opinion has already found him guilty he could easily find himself on the receiving end of a vigilante or two that hunt rapists (this would unfortunately, be the case even if he was to be innocent)

Edit: Yes, I believe he's innocent.
---

Full Throttle posted...

Police investigated but found no evidence that she was raped or even had a sexual encounter with him.

A medical exam and rape kit within 25 hours of the incident found that she had no internal cuts or abrasions in her vagina and that there's no traces of his DNA

If it had an actual police investigation that turned up absolutely nothing, there's a pretty damn strong incentive to sue. Seems like a straightforward defamation case.

Full Throttle posted...

Do you think this kid is "innocent" because he wasn't charged?

If you can't even prove that the two had sex, a rape claim is pretty fucking thin. And it's very clear that not only did she get him expelled but she continued to harass him with the intention of getting him expelled from other schools.
---

He's got a tough fight in the US court system, which is stacked against innocent men like him, but I hope he wins and takes her to the cleaners, she's basically destroyed his whole life in a continued campaign of slander and harassment.

Tested 25 hours after and it couldn't even be proven if they had sex, no record of the injuries she claimed, etc.... Cripes.

Out of curiosity I do wonder why she decided to ruin his life, what he did to piss her off so much. But that's not really important, and ultimately victim blaming.

She needs to be sued and ruined.

Enough of this feminist garbage that allows women to make false claims, with ZERO proof, and destroy the lives of innocent men.

Women are supposed to be strong and independent, thus they need to be held accountable for their actions.
---

I hope he wins and she is dragged through the mud. She should also face criminal charges for this. False rape accusations aren't a joke, and nonsense like #metoo movement only encourage it.
---

streamofthesky posted...

Out of curiosity I do wonder why she decided to ruin his life, what he did to piss her off so much. But that's not really important, and ultimately victim blaming.

It's that spoiled princess, entitled mentality of many modern females.

He probably friend-zoned her or something. Damaged her pride. So she decided to lash out in the most efficient way possible: False rape allegations. The guaranteed way to ruin any man's life. No need for evidence. Just her word against his.

This crap is becoming frighteningly common. Just look at what Chris Hardwick is dealing with right now.

Sometimes it gets blurry, but it's still never justified. Like a girl and a guy get a little tipsy together. They have sex. She regrets it the next morning because she realizes the guy isn't as attractive as she thought he was. It's better for her ego to claim he raped her, than to just swallow her pride and admit she had a one night stand with a stranger.
---

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Just because she cannot prove he raped her, does not mean he didn't rape her.

GreenKnight127 posted...

It's better for her ego to claim he raped her, than to just swallow her pride and admit she had a one night stand with a stranger.

Do you see the way people are treating her in this very thread? You really think this is better for her than admitting to a consensual one-night stand?
---

Golden Road posted...

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Just because she cannot prove he raped her, does not mean he didn't rape her.

It isn't, but unlike many sexual assault cases, it sounds like this one has been thoroughly investigated to the fullest extent possible and they have found nothing to even indicate he had sex with her, let alone raped her (or that anyone raped her). What she's describing should have left ample physical evidence, especially where she was seen 25 hours later, but there was nothing. In a case like this, there's no reason not to think he's innocent.

For that matter, where neither recalls the events of the night, even if a rape did occur, they technically raped each other. That's not necessarily convincing testimony, since "I was drunk and I forget everything" is a convenient cop-out if giving an actual testimony, but if that's been accepted as the official story, they're equally guilty.

GreenKnight127 posted...

This crap is becoming frighteningly common.

It really isn't. A small handful of high-profile false accusations are noticeable, but that doesn't mean they comprise a significant percentage of all accusations.
---

Golden Road posted...

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Just because she cannot prove he raped her, does not mean he didn't rape her.

We don't live in guilty until proven innocent. That is a bar that is basically impossible to reach, and an argument that can be used to defend all manner of pure idiocy.

We we have is evidence that would make him not guilty in the court of law. That gives him grounds to sue her for defamation when she makes it clear herself she had no clue what happened and no evidence at all to back up her claims.

Golden Road posted...

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Just because she cannot prove he raped her, does not mean he didn't rape her.

GreenKnight127 posted...

It's better for her ego to claim he raped her, than to just swallow her pride and admit she had a one night stand with a stranger.

Do you see the way people are treating her in this very thread? You really think this is better for her than admitting to a consensual one-night stand?

It's not just a case of "can't prove he did it."

She's continued to harass this man and ruin his life. He might possibly be guilty, but there's a good chance he's innocent as well, and legally he is. We're trashing her because of her actions after the alleged incident and reporting him to the police. That was justified. The unending vicious slander and attacks is not.

But yes, at this point she's faced with actual consequences for her actions so she's definitely not going to recant and admit she lied, even if she did, because then she'd lose in court for sure. She's the one that took it this far.

Golden Road posted...

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Just because she cannot prove he raped her, does not mean he didn't rape her.

Ah, but proving a negative is not how the legal system works.

Can you prove to me, right now, that you aren't a pedophile?

Sure, you can just say you aren't a pedophile. Maybe even get a few friends or family members to reassure me that you aren't a pedophile. But the absence of evidence is still not evidence of absence.

They even said the rape kit found absolutely no evidence that she was raped. His DNA wasn't anywhere on her. That detail alone is pretty damn crucial. People just like to get emotional about this stuff, because they feel like it's sexist if they don't immediately believe her and incarcerate him.

It's a very volatile time to me a man. It's very sad.

Very strange time in our history.
---

Golden Road posted...

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Just because she cannot prove he raped her, does not mean he didn't rape her.

That's the dumbest sjw bullshit I've heard in a while.

Yeah... No. Before making a life-destroying accusation such as an accusation of rape (especially considering the kind of reactions from all the simps and white knights on social media), you better fucking have evidence. She didn't prove shit and thus he's not guilty of anything.

That girl deserves to have her life destroyed. Such she's another entitled attention whore who didn't get her way and is now being petty about it.

Women are strong and independent? Then they need to be accountable for their actions.
---

All signs point to his innocence and her craziness.
---

The_tall_midget posted...

Yeah... No. Before making a life-destroying accusation such as an accusation of rape (especially considering the kind of reactions from all the simps and white knights on social media), you better fucking have evidence. She didn't prove shit and thus he's not guilty of anything.

That girl deserves to have her life destroyed. Such she's another entitled attention whore who didn't get her way and is now being petty about it.

So it only works one way? If she needs Absolute Proof in order to call him a rapist, why doesn't he need Absolute Proof in order to call her a liar?
---

Full Throttle posted...

Police investigated but found no evidence that she was raped or even had a sexual encounter with him.

A medical exam and rape kit within 25 hours of the incident found that she had no internal cuts or abrasions in her vagina and that there's no traces of his DNA

Fair. next.
---

Golden Road posted...

The_tall_midget posted...

Yeah... No. Before making a life-destroying accusation such as an accusation of rape (especially considering the kind of reactions from all the simps and white knights on social media), you better fucking have evidence. She didn't prove shit and thus he's not guilty of anything.

That girl deserves to have her life destroyed. Such she's another entitled attention whore who didn't get her way and is now being petty about it.

So it only works one way? If she needs Absolute Proof in order to call him a rapist, why doesn't he need Absolute Proof in order to call her a liar?

Lol what proof do you need besides the absence of proof? That's how investigations work. If Jimmy supposedly killed Mark but literally nothing shows he did, then Jimmy is innocent. The absence of proof is proof. Until they find literally anything to show he's the culprit, he is only accused. One person's word versus another's when everything so far shows that their word is bullshit is grounds for acquittal.
---

Police investigated but found no evidence that she was raped or even had a sexual encounter with him.

A medical exam and rape kit within 25 hours of the incident found that she had no internal cuts or abrasions in her vagina and that there's no traces of his DNA

Okay. But did they smell his dick?
---

Heard about this story on talk radio on the way home from work. They were saying that the guy should sue his former employers and the school. He was fired from his job and kicked out of school without any evidence of wrong doing. They acted simply on the accusation of the woman rather than waiting for evidence or due process.

Anyway, the people talking about the story on the radio were Leeann Tweeden and Lauren Sivan (prominent members of the me too movement -- Lauren accused Harvey Weinstein of sexual assault and Leeann Tweeden had that picture of former Senator Al Franken that was in bad taste which forced him to resign), and both agreed that baseless accusations like this from women who are simply out to get someone (without proof) are harmful to the movement. Considering the medical exam and rape kit that were done within a day of the alleged incident, there should have been at least something, some little piece of evidence to prove what she claimed. But there was nothing.

The host of the radio show (Dr. Drew Pinsky -- yes, a real doctor who practices at Huntington Memorial Hospital where my son was born) said that with the claims of violence against her, within 25 hours there should be at least some shred of evidence that the medical examiners could find if her claims were true. The fact that they found nothing is pretty clear that it didn't happen. Anyway, they were all saying on the radio that he should sue the school and his former employer for acting without giving him a chance to prove himself.

Golden Road posted...

The_tall_midget posted...

Yeah... No. Before making a life-destroying accusation such as an accusation of rape (especially considering the kind of reactions from all the simps and white knights on social media), you better fucking have evidence. She didn't prove shit and thus he's not guilty of anything.

That girl deserves to have her life destroyed. Such she's another entitled attention whore who didn't get her way and is now being petty about it.

So it only works one way? If she needs Absolute Proof in order to call him a rapist, why doesn't he need Absolute Proof in order to call her a liar?

So any woman should be able to ruin a dudes life for no reason?

Also absolute proof isn't required. You just need people to lack reasonable doubt.

#fuckupherlife

Throw the dumb bitch in jail for a little while too.
---

i mean he's never gonna get that money from her....but now everyone knows what she's done so i guess that's a plus.
---

"frat" and "rape" go together like hobos and booze. it's a easy story to push.... fucking scary

that's why i never joined one. besides, i don't want to share the babes. no foreign glaze on dis longjohn bro
---

BlackScythe0 posted...

Golden Road posted...

So it only works one way? If she needs Absolute Proof in order to call him a rapist, why doesn't he need Absolute Proof in order to call her a liar?

So any woman should be able to ruin a dudes life for no reason?

Also absolute proof isn't required. You just need people to lack reasonable doubt.

That would be terrible for rapists to be able to sue their accusers just because there wasn't enough evidence for a conviction. Rape victims do not need even more reason to fear reporting their rape.
---

Golden Road posted...

BlackScythe0 posted...

Golden Road posted...

So it only works one way? If she needs Absolute Proof in order to call him a rapist, why doesn't he need Absolute Proof in order to call her a liar?

So any woman should be able to ruin a dudes life for no reason?

Also absolute proof isn't required. You just need people to lack reasonable doubt.

That would be terrible for rapists to be able to sue their accusers just because there wasn't enough evidence for a conviction. Rape victims do not need even more reason to fear reporting their rape.

But in this case there was literally no evidence they even fucked. So I'm not sure why you're defending her.
---

GreenKnight127 posted...

streamofthesky posted...

Out of curiosity I do wonder why she decided to ruin his life, what he did to piss her off so much. But that's not really important, and ultimately victim blaming.

It's that spoiled princess, entitled mentality of many modern females.

He probably friend-zoned her or something. Damaged her pride. So she decided to lash out in the most efficient way possible: False rape allegations. The guaranteed way to ruin any man's life. No need for evidence. Just her word against his.

This crap is becoming frighteningly common. Just look at what Chris Hardwick is dealing with right now.

Sometimes it gets blurry, but it's still never justified. Like a girl and a guy get a little tipsy together. They have sex. She regrets it the next morning because she realizes the guy isn't as attractive as she thought he was. It's better for her ego to claim he raped her, than to just swallow her pride and admit she had a one night stand with a stranger.

That or they both got drunk, passed out somewhere, she just automatically assumed (wrongly) that she'd been raped, and then brazenly lied about the details to get people to take her claims more seriously. And, after a certain point, she's too deep to back out of the lies so all she can do is keep up the act while trying to convince herself that it actually happened.

Golden Road posted...

GreenKnight127 posted...

It's better for her ego to claim he raped her, than to just swallow her pride and admit she had a one night stand with a stranger.

Do you see the way people are treating her in this very thread? You really think this is better for her than admitting to a consensual one-night stand?

More importantly, at this point admitting to her lies wouldn't just completely destroy her, she'd also risk being arrested. She has to double-down.

mayatola posted...

Heard about this story on talk radio on the way home from work. They were saying that the guy should sue his former employers and the school. He was fired from his job and kicked out of school without any evidence of wrong doing. They acted simply on the accusation of the woman rather than waiting for evidence or due process.

Definitely the school, but it's harder to go after the employer since it was just an internship anyway and they're far less of a party to this.

Golden Road posted...

That would be terrible for rapists to be able to sue their accusers just because there wasn't enough evidence for a conviction. Rape victims do not need even more reason to fear reporting their rape.

But apparently it's perfectly fine for people to openly lie about people and destroy their lives?
---

Golden Road posted...

BlackScythe0 posted...

Golden Road posted...

So it only works one way? If she needs Absolute Proof in order to call him a rapist, why doesn't he need Absolute Proof in order to call her a liar?

So any woman should be able to ruin a dudes life for no reason?

Also absolute proof isn't required. You just need people to lack reasonable doubt.

That would be terrible for rapists to be able to sue their accusers just because there wasn't enough evidence for a conviction. Rape victims do not need even more reason to fear reporting their rape.

He isn't suing her for accusing him.

He is suing her for ruining his life.

Golden Road posted...

BlackScythe0 posted...

Golden Road posted...

So it only works one way? If she needs Absolute Proof in order to call him a rapist, why doesn't he need Absolute Proof in order to call her a liar?

So any woman should be able to ruin a dudes life for no reason?

Also absolute proof isn't required. You just need people to lack reasonable doubt.

That would be terrible for rapists to be able to sue their accusers just because there wasn't enough evidence for a conviction. Rape victims do not need even more reason to fear reporting their rape.

The absence of evidence despite such a thorough investigation is reasonable cause to believe that the allegations are false. That's very different from simply saying that there isn't enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he's guilty. In this case, the absence of evidence proves beyond a reasonable doubt that he's innocent. Despite this, she's continued to slander him. That's reason to sue.

There is indeed a very delicate line between deliberate false accusations and accusations that just can't be proven in court, and it's extremely important to avoid punishing the latter in punishing the former (and also to avoid seeming like the latter can be punished, since the appearance matters almost as much as the reality here). In this case, though, there isn't much doubt which side of that line she's falling on. I very much do not believe this rape happened (at least based on the events presented in Duckbear's paraphrasing of Dailymail's account of the story, which is not necessarily a comprehensive understanding of the situation).
---

Golden Road posted...

BlackScythe0 posted...

Golden Road posted...

So it only works one way? If she needs Absolute Proof in order to call him a rapist, why doesn't he need Absolute Proof in order to call her a liar?

So any woman should be able to ruin a dudes life for no reason?

Also absolute proof isn't required. You just need people to lack reasonable doubt.

That would be terrible for rapists to be able to sue their accusers just because there wasn't enough evidence for a conviction. Rape victims do not need even more reason to fear reporting their rape.

It's not the fact that she's accusing him, it's the fact that she went out of her way to try and ruin his life when there's no evidence whatsoever that he's guilty, and no charges came out of it. She's a spiteful bitch, and deserves to lose this lawsuit.
---

Golden Road posted...

The_tall_midget posted...

Yeah... No. Before making a life-destroying accusation such as an accusation of rape (especially considering the kind of reactions from all the simps and white knights on social media), you better fucking have evidence. She didn't prove shit and thus he's not guilty of anything.

That girl deserves to have her life destroyed. Such she's another entitled attention whore who didn't get her way and is now being petty about it.

So it only works one way? If she needs Absolute Proof in order to call him a rapist, why doesn't he need Absolute Proof in order to call her a liar?

She has literally 0 proof to call him a rapist.

He has proof that she's a liar who intends/intended to ruin his life by her not only posting evidence of her interacting with his place of employment and past college, but also interacting with his college he is currently going to in an attempt to do as much damage as possible to him.
---

lihlih posted...

It's not the fact that she's accusing him, it's the fact that she went out of her way to try and ruin his life when there's no evidence whatsoever that he's guilty, and no charges came out of it. She's a spiteful bitch, and deserves to lose this lawsuit.

It should be made a serious crime for what she did. At least a 5 year prison sentence minimum.
---