LogFAQs > #922073644

Unbridled9 posted...

That's not what I said, implied to have said, could have been interpreted to have reasonably said, or anything of the sort. And no. This is pure delusion as to what I'm saying on your part.

Your exact words were "that's an already-abundant amount of rights" in reference to the right to use birth control or be abstinent. The implication is therefore that one only needs some pre-defined quantity of rights, after which bodily autonomy stops being an essential right and can be infringed upon at will. If that's not what you're saying, I invite you to reword it to communicate your point better.

Unbridled9 posted...

As such I won't even bother to respond to the rest of what you said until I feel certain you won't just read only what you want to read from it.

Now that's just weak. Again, if I misinterpret what you say, you're more than welcome to correct me and clarify.