LogFAQs > #923681794

Not finding much more to comment on. Chris i've always sucked at finding pairs that can't be scum together. So I treat my reads as independent until there are fewer players. I feel like that gives higher utility for my time in D1 and D2. Once the ratio of scum to town is brought closer to 50/50 that's when I typically look closer about exactly how people interact together. There's a lot more data and a lot less noise. I think the noise comes from having proportionally more town alive.

@Corrik7 I'm not sure why you think Red might be town after everything. I'm honestly not sure if you're just being contrary to get reads on people. But it sounds like you're just using effort to measure Red. I don't think effort is the right way to measure scum Red.

Red wasn't scum last game because he didn't post much D1 and D2. He didn't post much because he was at Disney. He was scum because of how he was lurking. He was scum because he posted "content" that wasn't actually very helpful. Red D1 here did the same thing lots of "helpful" content that isn't actually helpful and a measurable uptick in activity.

Also if we assume that activity is indicative of his scum play then we should take his activity this game with a grain of salt because scum Red would know people would be watching for his activity after the flak he was getting for being inactive D1 and D2 of last game no matter what his excuses were. So, his activity so be a null tell in that context.

##vote: Red

Since I'm going to be gone all day I'm leaving my vote here. FYI, I don't particularly care what he claims. He's had enough time to work up a fake claim. There are of course exceptions, but I doubt anything he'd claim would be meaningful to me. Press him to claim or not. I think B8 relies too much on that tactic.
---

I'm the Pez and I'm AWESOME