LogFAQs > #923691139

red sox 777 posted...

Mr Lasastryke posted...

Vlado posted...

For what? For not starting a war with Iran? (for now)

apparently he has obstructed justice, as LotM said.

I am fairly confident that the US Supreme Court would rule that it is impossible, as a matter of law, for a sitting president to commit obstruction of justice as to a federal investigation.

Hey, so no shame in not knowing something, but this part of what you said is factually incorrect

There is nothing in the law that says sitting presidents are immune from prosecution.

It is just the current policy of the DoJ not to prosecute. It's not a law, just something the DoJ decided during the scramble during Nixon. And if the proper office doesn't prosecute someone, they don't go to trial
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.