LogFAQs > #923769860

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	11 Oregon Republicans have LEFT as 1 said he'll SHOOT POLICE if they get him!!!
InfestedAdam 06/24/19 10:03:35 AM #10:	Blaqthourne posted... there aren't enough present to make a quorum. Thinking about it a bit I first thought why not change the law/rule so that there is no minimum number to make a quorum to avoid situations like this. And then I realize that itself causes problems where you potentially can have individuals from one party or another meeting and voting without the opposing parties there to vote against. Is there any such system where such approach/abuse can be avoided or there's always bound to be some loop hole? I was gonna suggest these representatives should do their job but I guess stalling a vote is technically doing it if it goes against what their party wants. --- "You must gather your party before venturing forth" "Go for the eyes Boo! Go for the eyes!" <cite>InfestedAdam posted [p:923769860] in 11 Oregon ... [t:77814197]...</cite> <quote><cite>Blaqthourne posted...</cite> <quote>there aren't enough present to make a quorum.</quote> Thinking about it a bit I first thought why not change the law/rule so that there is no minimum number to make a quorum to avoid situations like this. And then I realize that itself causes problems where you potentially can have individuals from one party or another meeting and voting without the opposing parties there to vote against. Is there any such system where such approach/abuse can be avoided or there's always bound to be some loop hole? I was gonna suggest these representatives should do their job but I guess stalling a vote is technically doing it if it goes against what their party wants. --- "You must gather your party before venturing forth" "Go for the eyes Boo! Go for the eyes!"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1