Why does how the animals were raised matter to the morality of torturing them? Again, if you wouldn't say it was acceptable to raise dogs from birth for slaughter, what's the point of raising this as an argument
Do you have justification for your position or not? Why would profit morally justify torture of other animals besides dogs?
I could see how someone could read that argument if they were illiterate. not what anyone in this topic has actually said though, unfortunately for you.
"Fuck everyone but the west" seems to be the factor here, since you don't seem to care much about the "hApPy HoRmOnEs" or smiles from animals that other cultures value.
Asking you for sources is not goal post moving. You can cry all you want, but ultimately if you can't actually source research that contradicts my earlier sources demonstrating pig's ability to form social bonds with humans, you're doing nothing but making a spectacle of yourself and wasting breath.
You don't answer a question with a question, it doesn't work that way. All you're doing is seeing my points, ignoring them and asking other stuff. It's dishonest.
About the part in bold:
1) Why are you doing the "hApPy HoRmOnEs" thing as if it were a dumbass concept? It's real. 2) That's the entire point, Einstein, the other animals don't get "hApPy HoRmOnEs" like dogs do when they see their owner, THAT IS THE ENTIRE POINT.
At least we've uncovered the real issue here, you're arguing from a cultural resentment perspective. Somehow you managed to view a story about dogs getting boiled alive as a east vs west thing