LogFAQs > #923851909

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Will transgenders be allowed in sports?
gunplagirl 06/25/19 10:59:57 PM #47:	GreatEvilEmpire posted... gunplagirl posted... Hey look, more people with made-up science trying to argue how they know better than the goddamned Olympic committee that spent years figuring out what parameters to set in order to allow trans competition with other members of their gender. I get that you all hate antivaxxers for their made up "facts" but some of you nosedive at the chance to use fake and made up concepts (biological woman, born man, etc.) that you heard one time. Hey look, it's the person who love to make shit up about everything. Men are taller than women. Men have high bone density than women. Men have more muscle mass than women. Men have BIGGER lungs than women. Transitioning only reduces muscle mass, but it won't make someone shorter, lower their bone density, or make their lungs smaller. And even with reduced muscle mass, they still have more muscle mass than women 3 years after taking androgen blockers. That's real science, not the same as the bullshit you make up to justify your nonsense. The IOC is trying be "inclusive", but it doesn't mean they're right. HS sports doesn't require anything other than someone identity as their preferred gender. No surgery, no androgen blockers, nothing. Nothing is properly regulated outside of IOC and women are getting dominated. But go ahead, continue to be dishonest and spread your bs. People of African descent have denser bones. We don't use race science like that to designate black men and women as in a league above all other races, despite the fact that there ARE an extremely high proportion of black athletes in running events taking home medals. Speaking of which, how many trans athletes who have made it to the Olympics have won a gold medal, and how many trans athletes in total have there been? You're also ignoring that there's trans people who transitioned and were on hormone blockers before puberty, preventing that "bone mass" argument from ever coming in to play for trans women. Gonna need you to cite at least two reports that verify your "even after 3 years" claim for muscle mass, and at least one has to actually acknowledge the concept of muscle atrophy in it with a control group that didn't exercise while on androgen blockers. For what it's worth, I'll even ignore the country the study comes from, as the most commonly prescribed blocker in the US isn't as effective as the one in other Western nations. If you're getting pissed over high school sports, consider the following: can you name ANY trans athletes who transitioned, participated, and have earned an athletics scholarship? Any at all? --- https://i.imgtc.ws/x2KBsjI.png <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:923851909] in Will trans... [t:77818544]...</cite> <quote><cite>GreatEvilEmpire posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote>Hey look, more people with made-up science trying to argue how they know better than the goddamned Olympic committee that spent years figuring out what parameters to set in order to allow trans competition with other members of their gender. I get that you all hate antivaxxers for their made up "facts" but some of you nosedive at the chance to use fake and made up concepts (biological woman, born man, etc.) that you heard one time.</quote> Hey look, it's the person who love to make shit up about everything. Men are taller than women. Men have high bone density than women. Men have more muscle mass than women. Men have BIGGER lungs than women. Transitioning only reduces muscle mass, but it won't make someone shorter, lower their bone density, or make their lungs smaller. And even with reduced muscle mass, they still have more muscle mass than women 3 years after taking androgen blockers. That's real science, not the same as the bullshit you make up to justify your nonsense. The IOC is trying be "inclusive", but it doesn't mean they're right. HS sports doesn't require anything other than someone identity as their preferred gender. No surgery, no androgen blockers, nothing. Nothing is properly regulated outside of IOC and women are getting dominated. But go ahead, continue to be dishonest and spread your bs.</quote> People of African descent have denser bones. We don't use race science like that to designate black men and women as in a league above all other races, despite the fact that there ARE an extremely high proportion of black athletes in running events taking home medals. Speaking of which, how many trans athletes who have made it to the Olympics have won a gold medal, and how many trans athletes in total have there been? You're also ignoring that there's trans people who transitioned and were on hormone blockers before puberty, preventing that "bone mass" argument from ever coming in to play for trans women. Gonna need you to cite at least two reports that verify your "even after 3 years" claim for muscle mass, and at least one has to actually acknowledge the concept of muscle atrophy in it with a control group that didn't exercise while on androgen blockers. For what it's worth, I'll even ignore the country the study comes from, as the most commonly prescribed blocker in the US isn't as effective as the one in other Western nations. If you're getting pissed over high school sports, consider the following: can you name ANY trans athletes who transitioned, participated, and have earned an athletics scholarship? Any at all? --- https://i.imgtc.ws/x2KBsjI.png</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1