LogFAQs > #923864867

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Will transgenders be allowed in sports?
gunplagirl 06/26/19 9:05:37 AM #59:	GreatEvilEmpire posted... gunplagirl posted... You literally couldn't even find resources that verify the argument you're making and you're falsely extrapolating information that isn't actually there. The only one with no grasp on reality is yourself. The facts can smack you in the face and you wouldn't notice it. You're a science denier. Nothing will fit your fantasy narrative. I can find the best research paper in the world and you will pretend it's not real. You're intentionally being obtuse, so shoo. >Be you >Says that men have larger lung capacity than women >Tries applying that to trans women by using an article that doesn't mention trans people in it at all, especially not ones who have been on hormones for any degree of time Extrapolation of that nature is unscientific. That's literally basic science. The only "science" you have is taking cis science and saying it's an absolute truth that cis men and trans women are exactly the same. Which of course is because you don't consider trans women to actually be women in any capacity. Which is also not at all scientifically accurate, as per the consensus of the global medical community. But hey, if you can't even get a basic detail like that right? What was it I said earlier, "don't waste my time with your bullshit" or something like that. You're more actually using science, you're using crap you heard on a Joe Rogan podcast, them smearing that figurative shit all over the place and feel proud for doing it. --- https://i.imgtc.ws/x2KBsjI.png <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:923864867] in Will trans... [t:77818544]...</cite> <quote><cite>GreatEvilEmpire posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote> You literally couldn't even find resources that verify the argument you're making and you're falsely extrapolating information that isn't actually there. The only one with no grasp on reality is yourself.</quote> The facts can smack you in the face and you wouldn't notice it. You're a science denier. Nothing will fit your fantasy narrative. I can find the best research paper in the world and you will pretend it's not real. You're intentionally being obtuse, so shoo.</quote> >Be you >Says that men have larger lung capacity than women >Tries applying that to trans women by using an article that doesn't mention trans people in it at all, especially not ones who have been on hormones for any degree of time Extrapolation of that nature is unscientific. That's literally basic science. The only "science" you have is taking cis science and saying it's an absolute truth that cis men and trans women are exactly the same. Which of course is because you don't consider trans women to actually be women in any capacity. Which is also not at all scientifically accurate, as per the consensus of the global medical community. But hey, if you can't even get a basic detail like that right? What was it I said earlier, "don't waste my time with your bullshit" or something like that. You're more actually using science, you're using crap you heard on a Joe Rogan podcast, them smearing that figurative shit all over the place and feel proud for doing it. --- https://i.imgtc.ws/x2KBsjI.png</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1