LogFAQs > #924380094

I am fine with your proposed rules should you choose to use them, but I think that the concept of there being no compensation for letting UFAs walk works just fine in real life and in here, and trying to force something to take its place isn't always going to work out for the better. If people want compensation for their impending UFAs, they should trade them when they have a year left. That's the risk they choose to take by hanging on to dudes when they may be better served trading them a year earlier.

My main concern like it has been mentioned, is that it is yet another avenue for people to bypass having to pay a premium to get the players they want from other teams, and it unduly rewards the sending team for not having the foresight of when to get rid of players for compensation and when to keep them. It is a no-risk gambit for those involved, something which I would think clashes with your mindset about the project, given how you artificially lower the cap for user teams because things were too easy in the past.
---

I'm a greener egg than the eggs from dr. seuss