You dont?. you don't think it is blatant exploitation?. What fundementaly defines an act of sex as rape, is when you make sex on someone without their consent. If the woman consents to sex only on the condition of the man wearing a condom, but then during the sex he takes the condom off, then he has removed the very condition for the sex.
Someone consenting to sex only under a strict condition, does not automaticly equal all conditions are permissable. Personally I think it's a very selfish thing to do, when you consider that the reason for someone wanting a condom worn during sex, is to protect them from STDs and pregnancies.
But id imagine that stealthing is a very hard crime to prove, and ultimately it probably falls down on, the defendant's word vs the prosecutors word.
Based on what he said, it looks like hes agreeing with you. I think hes saying he doesnt have a problem with it being called rape, as appear to not seeing a problem with stealthing... At least, thats how I read it... ---
Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.