LogFAQs > #925168351

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicDo you guys think using "implications" to get sex is rape?
LinkPizza
07/25/19 1:07:20 PM
#165:


dioxxys posted...
Mead posted...
dioxxys posted...
Bugmeat posted...
greenmist01 posted...
Apparently in Sweden......(correct me if im wrong here), apparently, if a woman consents to sex with a man, provided he wears a condom, but during the sex, the man takes off the condom, and then puts his penis into her vagina and continues the sex, its rape.

If true, I don't see a problem with this.



I do, you can have misunderstandings about this and miscommunicate things that could lead to man being punished for something as simple as not wearing protection and try to equate that to forceful unwarranted sex.


That isnt what is being described

If a guy intentionally removes a condom without his partner knowing or consenting to unprotected sex then that guy is in no way a victim in the situation

But how is it supposed to be proved intentional or not?

I say this because I have lived a similar circumstance where I had a misunderstanding with my sexual partner and where I thought she was consenting to no condom (as she had teased me with no-condom before). Turns out she was actually spaced out or something and had a serious issue with it later. Not during when the reality of it hit her.

She was really bothered by it, but instead of sitting down with me and having a discussion about how it bothered her, she cut me off. Which is her choice but while she should have just talked it over with me though I think she had been already looking for a reason to cut me off because now looking back, I was overstepping the fuck buddies boundary into the more like "boyfriend/girlfriend territory".

Had we lived in Sweden, she could have claimed rape, and I would have been seen as a vicious sexual predator, thats in no way just or fair. And thats my point in saying this is a flawed law.

Idk about your situation. But in this one, consent was given if they had a condom. And during sex, they take it off without the knowledge of the other person, and then continue sex. Or take it off, and the other person says no, and they continue sex. Thats whats going on in that scenario. Not just unprotected sex. This is when condom use was a requirement, and you started with one, then take it off. Want to make sure its. Or classified as rape, then keep the condom on. Or only have unprotected sex with certain people... in Sweden, at least... Its. Or a hard rule to follow, I would think. It can be exploited like any other rule, sure. But they still probably have procedures to figure out whos telling the truth and everything... But not taking a condom off while the act of having sex would probably help. Either wear the condom the whole time, or never put it on if its ok with them...
---
Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1