| Topic List | Page List: 1 |
|---|---|
| Topic | Do you guys think using "implications" to get sex is rape? |
| Kyuubi4269 07/26/19 8:23:53 PM #175: | Lirishae posted... Oh, for crying out loud. I never said anything remotely like that, and I didn't "choose" anything. I said I thought one interpretation was more likely based on previous statements by the same poster. You're trying to call me out for taking someone's words the wrong way because you think I have a poor opinion of them, but guess what you're doing right now? Your interpretation came from thinking poorly of him, and if you had an unbiased view of him, you would have assumed he was responding to the most recent thing, and he was. Don't try to flip this, you done wrong. Lirishae posted... Oh, good lord. The second scenario is about making a woman agree to have sex because she's afraid for her safety if she doesn't. That's plenty wrong. Following English common law, there's the lovely prerequisite that it's not rape if the "rapist" reasonably believed consent was given. If she says yes to sex and acts without any threat being used (which he knows he's not doing), he reasonably believed it was consensual so you can't charge. If you do not want sex then you say you do not want sex; to agree to something you don't want is insane and puts the blame squarely on you. --- Doctor Foxx posted... The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas. ... Copied to Clipboard! |
| Topic List | Page List: 1 |