StealthRock posted...mooreandrew58 posted...
StealthRock posted...
mooreandrew58 posted...
Questionmarktarius posted...
mooreandrew58 posted...
StealthRock posted...
Guns always do less damage than swords or daggers or even fists
Swords a much bigger pieces of metal being shoved into a body so that I can see.
p = mv
A half-ounce bullet going really freakin fast is going wreck shit way worse than a sword lobbing around at arm-speed or so.
Which brings us to another point of bizarre videogame logic: bullets traveling at a leisurely stroll.
Depends where it hits. You dont need as good of aim to land a lethal strike with a sword. Getting impaled in the torso is gonna wreck anyone.
Not really. There is no safe place to shoot someone where they wouldnt be at risk of death.
Its happened with lots of people though. Same risk with getting stabbed. But im talking straight impaled or a large gashing wound down the torso.
Not saying that countless people havent survived gunshots
In ancient times, most of the time people would not instantly die from a sword wound unless they were beheaded or stabbed through the heart. There are many people who have died instantly from gunshots.
Its a lot harder to drive a sword through bone and muscle to the soft tissues underneath than it is a bullet.
I'll say i guess it depends on the caliber. Ive seen more that one story or even video footage of a person being shot and it didnt even slow them down. Where Idk but I imagine taking a broadsword in the gut will halt the progress of damn near anyone.
---
Cid- "looks like that overgrown lobster just got served!" Bartz-"with cheese biscuts AND mashed potatoes!"
... Copied to Clipboard!