LogFAQs > #925260329

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Percent of men under 30 reporting no sex triples to record highs.
joe40001 07/27/19 3:14:38 PM #198:	Tupacrulez posted... joe40001 posted... Tupacrulez posted... joe40001 posted... The Admiral posted... Zodd3224 posted... Pulling out does not work. I had both of my children through the pull out method. The pull out method is 96% effective if done properly, which is actually higher than the effectiveness of birth control pills. A lot of people stay in too long and don't use the method properly. What does "96% effective" mean? Because if it means what I think it means (1/25 times you are effectively having unprotected sex) and a BABY is at risk of being created those are some pretty bad odds. I still don't get how people who are otherwise smart and also know that they are not ready to have a baby are ok with those kinds of odds. On the year, of 100 women use exclusively that method, 4 of them will get pregnant. In a year. 96% is pretty fucking effective. "On the year"? How often are the people having sex? That's got to effect things. And 1/25 isn't that low if you consider the consequence being a baby jfc Annually you obtuse nitwit. For a year, if you use whatever method, and are sexually active, you have X chance of making a baby. The chances of baby making are hugely variable time to time, so the chance is averaged over a sexually active year. Why the fuck is this so hard to understand? Because if you bang once a year or 1000 times a year both are considered "sexually active" but there's no way they have the same odds. And "on the year" is weird phrasing, no need busting out the n-word on me. --- "joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9 <cite>joe40001 posted [p:925260329] in Percent of... [t:77882141]...</cite> <quote>Tupacrulez posted...</cite> <quote>joe40001 posted...</cite> <quote>Tupacrulez posted...</cite> <quote>joe40001 posted...</cite> <quote>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote>Zodd3224 posted...</cite> <quote>Pulling out does not work. I had both of my children through the pull out method.</quote> The pull out method is 96% effective if done properly, which is actually higher than the effectiveness of birth control pills. A lot of people stay in too long and don't use the method properly.</quote> What does "96% effective" mean? Because if it means what I think it means (1/25 times you are effectively having unprotected sex) and a BABY is at risk of being created those are some pretty bad odds. I still don't get how people who are otherwise smart and also know that they are not ready to have a baby are ok with those kinds of odds.</quote> On the year, of 100 women use exclusively that method, 4 of them will get pregnant. In a year. 96% is pretty fucking effective.</quote> "On the year"? How often are the people having sex? That's got to effect things. And 1/25 isn't that low if you consider the consequence being a baby jfc</quote> Annually you obtuse nitwit. For a year, if you use whatever method, and are sexually active, you have X chance of making a baby. The chances of baby making are hugely variable time to time, so the chance is averaged over a sexually active year. Why the fuck is this so hard to understand?</quote> Because if you bang once a year or 1000 times a year both are considered "sexually active" but there's no way they have the same odds. And "on the year" is weird phrasing, no need busting out the n-word on me. --- "joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1