LogFAQs > #930441842

Now that I think about it, I think the reason foolmo thinks remote is superior to in person is the lack of strong rules and boundaries in most in-office places.

Remote basically guarantees you get flow time while most places aren't strict enough in person.

I think a theoretical high functioning highly organized in person workplace would overall be more effective than remote. One where you aren't allowed to interrupt someone except for emergencies or during very specific times of the day (last 2 hours usually since a lot of people usually work better in the morning). Besides that only async communication. It gives you best of both worlds, less random distractions but still the ability to get the benefits of in person communication.

Although clearly this ideal doesn't exist and will likely never exist, and I would say on average a remote work place would get you a good chunk more flow time than 95% of office environments.
---

DPOblivion beat us all.