LogFAQs > #931059053

HashtagSEP posted...

So to me personally, I could see somebody buying into all three, or somebody going "No, this is stupid" to all three, but it's weird to me to accept "immortal" and "flame conjuror" but not "possession."

I told you the difference multiple times

If Bray always had this aspect to his character it would be fine. The ability to tap into some sort of nigh invincibility at random from time to time, rather than it just randomly surfacing over 5 years into his career. If you just make it surface, a damn good explanation is necessary, which we have not received. Kane and Undertaker, that's how they've always been, so you kinda just accept that this is what the established character is.

Like if say I don't know TNA had Willow, Jeff Hardy's alternate identity, able to tank ungodly amounts of punishment or able to throw lightning when Jeff Hardy had never shown that ability, I would shit on it too.

Like you can refuse to accept there should be a difference but I'm telling you the difference I see, and it's a significant one. Changing an existing character demands more detail in the writing than introducing one. And that's true of anything, from the supernatural type characters to the normal ones. It's the same reason you typically would expect a reason for someone to turn someone heel, but if they debut as one you don't care as much.

---

No problem!
This is a cute and pop genocide of love!