LogFAQs > #934946934

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 274: Rebuttigieg
Nelson_Mandela 02/27/20 11:37:11 AM #11:	xp1337 posted... As we have discussed repeatedly at this point. Failing to break 15% state-wide does not mean no delegates. It's an important breakpoint for the statewide delegates but even at 16% you're almost certainly missing viability in multiple districts so you're missing delegates there as well. Getting, say, 14% would hurt, yes, but it's not significantly different from getting 16%. It's greater than the flat 2% would suggest but it's not 0 vs. something. Right, I keep forgetting how awful and convoluted the Democratic primary system is. There is not a single winner-take-all threshold? --- "A more mature answer than I expected."~ Jakyl25 "Sephy's point is right."~ Inviso <cite>Nelson_Mandela posted [p:934946934] in Politics C... [t:78435192]...</cite> <quote>xp1337 posted... </cite> <quote>As we have discussed repeatedly at this point. Failing to break 15% state-wide does not mean no delegates. It's an important breakpoint for the statewide delegates but even at 16% you're almost certainly missing viability in multiple districts so you're missing delegates there as well. Getting, say, 14% would hurt, yes, but it's not significantly different from getting 16%. It's greater than the flat 2% would suggest but it's not 0 vs. something.</quote>Right, I keep forgetting how awful and convoluted the Democratic primary system is. There is not a single winner-take-all threshold? --- "A more mature answer than I expected."~ Jakyl25 "Sephy's point is right."~ Inviso</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1