LogFAQs > #936829384

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 289: You Down to Invoke P? Yeah You Know Me!
ChaosTonyV4 04/05/20 2:01:12 PM #297:	HeroDelTiempo17 posted... What argument? They both recognize and disagree with the massive M4A spending required. The only difference is that Kirk is being alarmist (from his perspective) about huge spending now leading to even more spending later, and LotM seems to think that it's not even a possibility that Congress would approve it. I really think the headline's wording is doing a lot of heavy lifting on extending any credit to Kirk here tbqh. He's not saying it's affordable, he's saying that it could pass anyways but Kirk himself is just fearmongering. He is very much against the justification that $3 trillion/year is fine, and trying to paint that as some sort of ridiculous mainstream Congress opinion so that he looks like the reasonable one. My guy I read past the headline to what he said. The fact that hes scaremongering or bad faith arguing isnt whats important imo. Its that hes willing to recognize the argument and Democrats arent. Hell, Trump is practically a coin flip from deciding to support Medicare for All at this point, we all know he has no Conservative ideological consistency and accidentally mentioned it before. If he does, the fact people like Charlie Kirk recognize the argument is gonna be pretty dangerous. --- Phantom Dust. "I'll just wait for time to prove me right again." - Vlado <cite>ChaosTonyV4 posted [p:936829384] in Politics C... [t:78535835]...</cite> <quote>HeroDelTiempo17 posted... </cite> <quote>What argument? They both recognize and disagree with the massive M4A spending required. The only difference is that Kirk is being alarmist (from his perspective) about huge spending now leading to even more spending later, and LotM seems to think that it's not even a possibility that Congress would approve it. I really think the headline's wording is doing a lot of heavy lifting on extending any credit to Kirk here tbqh. He's not saying it's affordable, he's saying that it could pass anyways but Kirk himself is just fearmongering. He is very much against the justification that $3 trillion/year is fine, and trying to paint that as some sort of ridiculous mainstream Congress opinion so that he looks like the reasonable one.</quote> My guy I read past the headline to what he said. The fact that hes scaremongering or bad faith arguing isnt whats important imo. Its that hes willing to recognize the argument and Democrats arent. Hell, Trump is practically a coin flip from deciding to support Medicare for All at this point, we all know he has no Conservative ideological consistency and accidentally mentioned it before. If he does, the fact people like Charlie Kirk recognize the argument is gonna be pretty dangerous. --- Phantom Dust. "I'll just wait for time to prove me right again." - Vlado</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1