LogFAQs > #946202779

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Why are people who are around 80 still politicians?
KStateKing17 10/23/20 1:19:32 PM #25:	tote_all posted... Unironically missing the fucking point. No. They should represent the entire population. Having able senior citizens is part of that. If they're old, corrupt billionares is a different issue, but TC is taking issue with age, which is fucking wrong and discriminatory. I meant the average age of working politicians shouldn't be decades above the average age of the rest of our workforce. There are seniors in the workforce and there nothing is wrong with that. I just don't believe that a group of people that are mostly 60 are going to be the best people to make decisions that could effect the next few decades of my life. --- The 17th King of the State of K <cite>KStateKing17 posted [p:946202779] in Why are pe... [t:79058054]...</cite> <quote>tote_all posted... </cite> <quote>Unironically missing the fucking point. No. They should represent the entire population. Having able senior citizens is part of that. If they're old, corrupt billionares is a different issue, but TC is taking issue with age, which is fucking wrong and discriminatory.</quote>I meant the average age of working politicians shouldn't be decades above the average age of the rest of our workforce. There are seniors in the workforce and there nothing is wrong with that. I just don't believe that a group of people that are mostly 60 are going to be the best people to make decisions that could effect the next few decades of my life. --- The 17th King of the State of K</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1