LogFAQs > #972645945

ConfusedTorchic posted...

the full indictment

That first one is just the same 2 paragraphs 34 times with different dates and voucher numbers. It does not give any indication as to what information is false. How there was intent to defraud, intent to commit another crime, or how it aids and conceals the commission of a crime. Or what other crime.

ConfusedTorchic posted...

the statement of facts

Is there something specific you would like to draw my attention to? Otherwise I could go sentence by sentence and pick apart how it fails to convey a better understanding of the issues I already outlined.

For example:
This payment was illegal, and Lawyer A has since pleaded guilty to making an illegal campaign contribution and served time in prison.

So it was illegal because it was considered a campaign contribution. Which further verifies it was the lawyers own money. The purpose it was used for wasn't illegal. It being viewed as a campaign contribution is what made it illegal.