LogFAQs > #973877440

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Realpolitick nuked. (continued)
Strand 06/02/23 9:36:02 AM #80:	Dat_Cracka_Jax posted... Isn't he mid 20s? I think his lack of experience is really glaring in this situation He lacks experience with GameFAQs, not with Fandom. He's been with Fandom since 2021, so he understands their policies more than SBAllen. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/6-gamefaqs-announcements/80356040 That's why I trust that his official statement reflects Fandom's actual policy. He stated that all politics boards were closed, not by virtue of being politics boards, but "specifically ones that violate our [Fandom's] terms of use by promoting abusive language." As a Community Manager with Fandom, he's familiar with their policies and what terms 261 violated. But since he lacks experience with GameFAQs, he was mistaken about 261 being the only political discussion board here. And why other boards haven't been closed yet, despite being more toxic than 261. That why neither SBAllen nor DToast have corrected or deleted the original announcement, even though it's been over two weeks. They can "clarify" things on CE, but they won't officially commit to banning politics-focused boards if that's not Fandom's actual policy. And them flip-flopping on that point has just created more confusion. --- "I am a man of somewhat retiring, and I might even say refined, tastes, and there is nothing more unaesthetic than a policeman." <cite>Strand posted [p:973877440] in Realpoliti... [t:80463554]...</cite> <quote>Dat_Cracka_Jax posted... </cite><quote>Isn't he mid 20s? I think his lack of experience is really glaring in this situation</quote>He lacks experience with GameFAQs, not with Fandom. He's been with Fandom since 2021, so he understands their policies more than SBAllen.https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/6-gamefaqs-announcements/80356040That's why I trust that his official statement reflects Fandom's actual policy. He stated that all politics boards were closed, not by virtue of being politics boards, but "specifically ones that violate our [Fandom's] terms of use by promoting abusive language."As a Community Manager with Fandom, he's familiar with their policies and what terms 261 violated. But since he lacks experience with GameFAQs, he was mistaken about 261 being the only political discussion board here. And why other boards haven't been closed yet, despite being more toxic than 261.That why neither SBAllen nor DToast have corrected or deleted the original announcement, even though it's been over two weeks. They can "clarify" things on CE, but they won't officially commit to banning politics-focused boards if that's not Fandom's actual policy. And them flip-flopping on that point has just created more confusion. --- "I am a man of somewhat retiring, and I might even say refined, tastes, and there is nothing more unaesthetic than a policeman."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1