LogFAQs > #974571774

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Is there any scientific evidence at all, that does not support evolution?
Notti 07/02/23 7:27:57 AM #57:	MisterPengy posted... It's not so much that "survival of the fittest" is wrong, it's just not really accurate. Sloths are a good example. They're sure as hell not fitter than any thing else. They survive by basically being unappealing; They smell bad and don't have enough meat for a large predator to target. But evolution-wise, they're successful, because they are able to survive and reproduce. I always thought a better way of stating it was "survival of the barely able" Because I've seen types of people that think "evolution says we should have wings and built in armor, and hawk eyes, because... evolution. Therefore evolution isn't real" --- http://m.youtube.com/TheYoungTurks/videos Bernie>Biden>poo>Trump http://RightWingWatch.org http://reddit.com/r/BreadTube http://fb.me/OccupyDemocrats <cite>Notti posted [p:974571774] in Is there a... [t:80492333]...</cite> <quote>MisterPengy posted... </cite><quote>It's not so much that "survival of the fittest" is wrong, it's just not really accurate.Sloths are a good example. They're sure as hell not fitter than any thing else. They survive by basically being unappealing; They smell bad and don't have enough meat for a large predator to target. But evolution-wise, they're successful, because they are able to survive and reproduce.</quote>I always thought a better way of stating it was "survival of the barely able" Because I've seen types of people that think "evolution says we should have wings and built in armor, and hawk eyes, because... evolution. Therefore evolution isn't real" --- http://m.youtube.com/TheYoungTurks/videos Bernie>Biden>poo>Trump http://RightWingWatch.org http://reddit.com/r/BreadTube http://fb.me/OccupyDemocrats</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1