LogFAQs > #976316667

SayHeyyShohei posted...

I'm struggling to see your point or gripe here.

Well because their sentence doesn't really matter to their categorization as a child pornographer, does it? Following the author's logic, if Texas changed its offender registry rules and took this guy off it, it would then be wrong for the author to publish this article and for people who work with the child pornographer to feel uncomfortable. But in reality, people really don't care about a felon's sentence, they care about the crime. It's totally unconvincing that the ethics of exposing the child pornographer worker depends on current Texas offender registry rules. Just own it, or don't publish the article, IMO.