LogFAQs > #979266669

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	To circumcise or not?
Tanthalas 03/08/24 7:39:37 PM #216:	Zonbei posted... bro what on earth are you talking about. Im beginning to think you arent even reading your OWN messages. I still havent directly compared rates of STDS in varying regions and said this is all due to circumcision. Which you may remember is what that was referring to. Nuh-uh, you don't get to change your claim now. This is your original comment: Zonbei posted... Oh we are doing the semantics game. Fun. Medical consensus is that the benefits exist. Clearly the statistical evidence (whether that be in controlled studies or in general) is there. My usages of significantly and slightly were not meant to be taken in the sense you are taking them. You cant directly compare rates of STDS and say oh its because of circumcision, and anyone who thinks you can isnt thinking very hard. Several times now you have said that circumcision lowers STDs and cancer, you can't now try to weasel yourself out of it by claiming "I've never said it was all because of circumcision!" --- Sir Markham pointed out, drinking another brandy. "A chap who can point at you and say 'die' has the distinct advantage". <cite>Tanthalas posted [p:979266669] in To circumc... [t:80716158]...</cite> <quote>Zonbei posted... </cite><quote>bro what on earth are you talking about. Im beginning to think you arent even reading your OWN messages. I still havent directly compared rates of STDS in varying regions and said this is all due to circumcision. Which you may remember is what that was referring to.</quote>Nuh-uh, you don't get to change your claim now. This is your original comment:<quote>Zonbei posted... </cite>Oh we are doing the semantics game. Fun. Medical consensus is that the benefits exist. Clearly the statistical evidence (whether that be in controlled studies or in general) is there. My usages of significantly and slightly were not meant to be taken in the sense you are taking them. You cant directly compare rates of STDS and say oh its because of circumcision, and anyone who thinks you can isnt thinking very hard.</quote>Several times now you have said that circumcision lowers STDs and cancer, you can't now try to weasel yourself out of it by claiming "I've never said it was all because of circumcision!" --- Sir Markham pointed out, drinking another brandy. "A chap who can point at you and say 'die' has the distinct advantage".</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1