LogFAQs > #979267052

Nirvanas_Nox posted...

Anyone notice that dude said that cut men can't produce smegma and when I said they actually can he contradicted himself by saying that they can but it's at a lower rate then uncut men. Like which is it dude can they or can't they?

me: but also there is the literal existence of the word Smegma. A word which refers to buildup under the foreskin that doesnt exist in circumcised men.

so let me put it another way: Ive literally never had to clean smegma and Im happy that way.

the foreskin doesnt exist in circumcised men. The foreskin. not smegma. The foreskin.

you pointed out smegma can happen in uncut men, and thus doesnt technically refer to solely buildup under the foreskin. I conceded that point, as it didnt really change mine. Welcome to an argument with an actual person instead of a brick wall that must argue every single thing they ever say to the death rather than ever concede an inch.