LogFAQs > #979267168

Tanthalas posted...

And again, they consulted with only ONE doctor that had ever published a study against circumcision, and the rest were organizations that vouch for circumcision.

Aka, they never actually addressed the criticism, they just spouted platitudes.

No, there are zero platitudes and a bunch of actual points and referrals to actual evidence. Are you just hoping nobody else is going to bother to read it? Or do you not know what a platitude is?

Hey; lets do a fun thing! Prove they only consulted with one doctor who had published a study against circumcision, and THEN prove there were other reputable doctors they should have consulted with but didnt who had published peer reviewed studies against circumcision.
Or dont, and invalidate your own prior complaints about unsourced claims. I dont really care which.

Me saying it was sprinkled was tongue in cheek because its literally constantly addressed starting in response 1, btw. Which youd know if you actually read it.