LogFAQs > #979630611

Itachi157 posted...

Dude I thought we were discussing whether or not its generally socially acceptable for a teacher (male or female) to do porn or have an OnlyFans (its not btw).

I dont know how this jumped to me condoning and excusing rape. But congrats I guess, your post is the most unhinged, manic and crazy response Ive ever gotten from someone on CE.

You claimed a man would be fired for having an OnlyFans. I provided evidence that men have had literal worse crimes covered. Actual, real evidence that men havent been fired for doing worse than having an OnlyFans.

So one of two things are true:
1) A man will be fired for having an OnlyFans, but not sexually assaulting a student
2) A man will not be fired for having an OnlyFans as a logical conclusion based on him not being fired for commiting actual crimes

So yes, I believe your assumption of the first case makes you someone who excuses sexual assault and rape. If you honestly believe a man would be fired for having an OnlyFans, something that is not a crime, while at the same time not acknowledging that men have and continue to get away with far worse, you are at best ignorant of how the world works. And that ignorance, which at this point I have to assume is intentional because thats the only way to maintain that level of cognitive dissonance, is tantamount to excusing far worse crimes that have actually happened because you believe a lesser offense would be punished.

Edit: Oh hey look, and I got moderated for trolling. The post that actually provided evidence that criminals have gotten away with far worse than an OnlyFans account by our institutions to prove that no, a man would not likely be fired for the same reason this female teacher was. Apparently providing actual evidence that men get away with crimes and women get punished for violating bullshit puritanical standards is trolling.