LogFAQs > #979852349

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicHot take, but the US should absolutely be sending troops to Ukraine.
ra2ah3roma2ma
04/11/24 9:50:23 AM
#11:


NFUN posted...
I'm relatively sure most historians would rate Lend-Lease (especially in the East) as being a more significant US impact in Europe in WW2 than our sending of troops
I can agree there, WW2 was a much different conflict. But WW1, if we'd have sent troops earlier, we'd have SIGNIFICANTLY improved it and prevented tons of deaths, including Americans. Instead Wilson was delusional throughout regarding how the war would play out, and how far Germany would go. Even after the Lusitania sunk, we didn't enter the war for two years, and we responded to a German threat to sink even neutral ships in the war zone with "nah they're bluffing this time".

---
This will be my sig until America abolishes legalized slavery
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1